Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33007365›Full record

ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2021

Biomedical nanoparticle design: What we can learn from viruses.

Sara Maslanka Figueroa, Daniel Fleischmann, Achim Goepferich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Virus-inspired strategies for cancer therapy.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Protein Nanoparticles: Uniting the Power of Proteins with Engineering Design Approaches.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  12. Evolution of drug delivery systems: From 1950 to 2020 and beyond.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Nano-engineered tools in the diagnosis, therapeutics, prevention, and mitigation of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  16. Photoacoustic Properties of Polypyrrole Nanoparticles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Maslanka FigueroaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel FleischmannDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Achim GoepferichDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: achim.goepferich@ur.de.
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses are nanomaterials with a number of properties that surpass those of many synthetic nanoparticles (NPs) for biomedical applications. They possess a rigorously ordered structure, come in a variety of shapes, and present unique surface elements, such as spikes. These attributes facilitate propitious biodistribution, the crossing of complex biological barriers and a minutely coordinated interaction with cells. Due to the orchestrated sequence of interactions of their stringently arranged particle corona with cellular surface receptors they effectively identify and infect their host cells with utmost specificity, while evading the immune system at the same time. Furthermore, their efficacy is enhanced by their response to stimuli and the ability to spread from cell to cell. Over the years, great efforts have been made to mimic distinct viral traits to improve biomedical nanomaterial performance. However, a closer look at the literature reveals that no comprehensive evaluation of the benefit of virus-mimetic material design on the targeting efficiency of nanomaterials exists. In this review we, therefore, elucidate the impact that viral properties had on fundamental advances in outfitting nanomaterials with the ability to interact specifically with their target cells. We give a comprehensive overview of the diverse design strategies and identify critical steps on the way to reducing them to practice. More so, we discuss the advantages and future perspectives of a virus-mimetic nanomaterial design and try to elucidate if viral mimicry holds the key for better NP targeting.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNanostructuresVirusesTissue DistributionNanoparticlesTargetingVirus-mimetic

Identifiers

PMID33007365
PMCPMC7525328
OpenAlexW3090886331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.