Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33007172›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Short-term outcomes after self-expandable metal stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Khayal Abdulmalik Alkhayal, Sulaiman Abdullah Alshammari, Ahmed Mohammed Al-Mazrou, Majid Abdulrahman Almadi, Omar Abdullah Al-Obeed, Ahmad Mohammed Zubaidi, Thamer Abdullah Bin Traiki, Noura Sufyan Alhassan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khayal Abdulmalik AlkhayalFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman Abdullah AlshammariFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Mohammed Al-MazrouFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majid Abdulrahman AlmadiFrom the Department of Internal Medicine/Gastroenterology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Abdullah Al-ObeedFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Mohammed ZubaidiFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer Abdullah Bin TraikiFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noura Sufyan AlhassanFrom the Department of Surgery/General Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are used as a bridge to surgery for colon cancer patients as an alternative to emergency surgery. Currently, there is a paucity of literature from Saudi Arabia on the preoperative usage of SEMS.

objectiveDetermine whether SEMS are associated with a higher rate of complications.

designRetrospective cohort study SETTINGS: Tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn patients diagnosed with obstructing colon cancer, up-front surgical resection was compared with insertion of SEMS followed by surgical resection between the years 2009 and 2013.

main outcome measuresRate of stent-related short-term complications. Secondary endpoint, postoperative complications. SAMPLE SIZE: 65.

resultsTwenty-four (36.9%) patients underwent SEMS placement; 41 (63.1%) underwent primary surgery. The median (interquartile range) hospital stay was significantly higher among the SEMS group (13 [8.5] days versus 7 [3] days in the primary surgery group,

conclusionSEMS is associated with longer hospital stays and short-term serious complications. Further research should be conducted, preferably with a larger sample size. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal ObstructionHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33007172
PMCPMC7532057
OpenAlexW3091614488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.