Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33007169›Full record

ReviewAnnals of Saudi medicine

Trends in bariatric surgery and incidentalomas at a single institution in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective study and literature review.

Mohammed Nabil AlAli, Fahad Bamehriz, Hassan Arishi, Mohammed K Aldeghaither, Fahad Alabdullatif, Khalid A Alnaeem, Abdulrahman F Alzamil, Ibrahim R AlHashim, Sarah Alhaizan, Tarek Aljuhani and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive factors and model validation of post-colon polyp surgeryWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed Nabil AlAliFrom the Department of General Surgery, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad BamehrizFrom the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan ArishiFrom the Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed K AldeghaitherFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlabdullatifFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid A AlnaeemFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman F AlzamilFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim R AlHashimFrom the College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah AlhaizanFrom the Department of General Surgery, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek AljuhaniFrom the Department of Pathology, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AldohayanFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Khalid University Hospital · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData are lacking on trends in bariatric surgery and the frequency of incidental findings in Saudi Arabia.

objectiveReport on trends in bariatric surgery as well as our experience in incidental findings along with a literature review (mainly on gastrointestinal stromal tumor).

designRetrospective chart and literature review. SETTINGS: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study at King Khalid University Hospital and analyzed the data collected from 2009 to 2019. We collected data on age, body mass index (BMI), H pylori infection, type of bariatric surgery performed, and type and location of incidental findings.

main outcome measuresIncidental findings during or after bariatric surgery (in pathology specimen). SAMPLE SIZE: 3052 bariatric surgeries, 46 patients with incidentalomas.

resultsThe mean and standard deviation for the age of the 46 patients with incidentalomas was 42.1 (13.9) years and the mean (SD) preoperative BMI was 43.4 (6.4) kg/m

conclusionThe number of incidentalomas and other findings were consistent with other reports. All these findings suggest that bariatric surgeons should take special care before, during, and after a laparoscopic operation in obese patients. LIMITATIONS: Since this is a single-center, retrospective study, we did not collect data on important variables such as gender, socioeconomic status of the patient, and family history of obesity, and we did not perform a preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultHumansRetrospective StudiesSaudi ArabiaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33007169
PMCPMC7532056
OpenAlexW3089797787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.