ArticlePloS one2020
Biomechanical comparison of standing posture and during trot between German shepherd and Labrador retriever dogs.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative kinematic analysis of forelimb and hindlimb cushioning strategies in German Shepherd dogs: implications for injury prevention.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Trimming of nails in healthy dogs does not change gait parameters when comparing pre- and post-nail trim.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Change in Center of Pressure During Perturbation of Balance Including Blindfolding in Healthy Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Balance Assessment on a Modified Posturomed Platform in Healthy Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Injury in Border Collies Competing in Agility Competitions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- The impact of cavaletti height on dogs' walking speed and its implications for ground reaction forces.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Characterization of FCI (Fédération Cynologique Internationale) Grades for Hip Dysplasia in Five Dog Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Vertical ground reaction forces, paw pressure distribution, and center of pressure during heelwork in working dogs competing in obedience.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Ground Reaction Forces and Center of Pressure within the Paws When Stepping over Obstacles in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Effect of Femoral Head and Neck Osteotomy on Canines' Functional Pelvic Position and Locomotion.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Variability in Gait Styles Used by Dogs Completing Weave Poles in Agility Competition and Its Effect on Completion of the Obstacle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that canine breeds stand and move differently. The prevalence of various musculoskeletal disorders such as hip and elbow dysplasia is also different between breeds. German shepherd dog (GSD) and Labrador retriever dog (LRD) are two large breeds with different conformations that have high prevalence of these disorders. This study quantifies the movement and standing posture of twelve healthy GSDs and twelve healthy LRDs to identify biomechanical similarities and differences that may be linked to sub-optimal hip and elbow mechanics. A pressure walkway and a motion capture system obtained measures of kinetics, kinematics and conformation during standing and trot. During standing, LRDs carry a greater percentage of the weight on the forelimbs (69%±5% vs. GSDs: 62%±2%, p<0.001) and their body Centre of Pressure (CoP) is located more cranially (p<0.001). GSDs had a greater pelvic tilt (79°±8 vs. 66°±9°, p = 0.004), more flexed stifles (44°±9° vs. LRDs: 34°±10°, p<0.05) and hocks (58°±11° vs. 26°±9°, p<0.01) and more extended hips (-10°±11° vs. 30°±12°, p<0.001). During trot, the GSDs' CoP had a longer anterior-posterior trajectory (151%±22% vs. LRDs: 93%±25% of the withers height, p<0.001). Stride parameters and loading of limbs were similar when normalised to the size and weight of the dog, respectively. The LRDs had a more extended thoracolumbar angle (p<0.001) and a less flexed lumbosacral angle (p<0.05). The LRDs' hip remained flexed during trot whereas the GSDs' hip joint was less flexed during swing (p<0.001) and more extended in late stance and early swing (p<0.001). In conclusion, the LRDs and GSDs differ in the way they stand and move and this would result in different loading pattern of the joints. Further investigation is required to determine the extent to which biomechanical differences are linked to musculoskeletal problems presented clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.