Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33006999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

In-silico drug repurposing study predicts the combination of pirfenidone and melatonin as a promising candidate therapy to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection progression and respiratory distress caused by cytokine storm.

Laura Artigas, Mireia Coma, Pedro Matos-Filipe, Joaquim Aguirre-Plans, Judith Farrés, Raquel Valls, Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes, Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez, Alex Olvera, Jose Barbera and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AnMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laura ArtigasAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia ComaAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro Matos-FilipeAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquim Aguirre-PlansStructural Bioinformatics Group, Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Department of Experimental and Health Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-1350
Judith FarrésAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel VallsAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Narcis Fernandez-FuentesDepartment of Biosciences, U Science Tech, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya, Vic, Catalonia, Spain.
Juan de la Haba-RodriguezMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute, Reina Sofia Hospital, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Alex OlveraInstitut de Recerca de la Sida-IrsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona (Barcelona), Spain.
Jose BarberaServicio de Medicina interna-Unidad de Infecciosas, La Mancha-Centro Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain.
Rafael MoralesServicio de Medicina interna-Unidad de Infecciosas, La Mancha-Centro Hospital, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain.
Baldo OlivaStructural Bioinformatics Group, Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Department of Experimental and Health Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-0250
Jose Manuel MasAnaxomics Biotech, Barcelona, Spain.
Anaxomics (Spain) · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESServicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESIrsiCaixa · ESUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From January 2020, COVID-19 is spreading around the world producing serious respiratory symptoms in infected patients that in some cases can be complicated by the severe acute respiratory syndrome, sepsis and septic shock, multiorgan failure, including acute kidney injury and cardiac injury. Cost and time efficient approaches to reduce the burthen of the disease are needed. To find potential COVID-19 treatments among the whole arsenal of existing drugs, we combined system biology and artificial intelligence-based approaches. The drug combination of pirfenidone and melatonin has been identified as a candidate treatment that may contribute to reduce the virus infection. Starting from different drug targets the effect of the drugs converges on human proteins with a known role in SARS-CoV-2 infection cycle. Simultaneously, GUILDify v2.0 web server has been used as an alternative method to corroborate the effect of pirfenidone and melatonin against the infection of SARS-CoV-2. We have also predicted a potential therapeutic effect of the drug combination over the respiratory associated pathology, thus tackling at the same time two important issues in COVID-19. These evidences, together with the fact that from a medical point of view both drugs are considered safe and can be combined with the current standard of care treatments for COVID-19 makes this combination very attractive for treating patients at stage II, non-severe symptomatic patients with the presence of virus and those patients who are at risk of developing severe pulmonary complications.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentCytokine Release SyndromeDatabases, PharmaceuticalFurinHumansMelatoninPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPyridonesAntiviral AgentsFurinFURIN protein, humanMelatoninpirfenidonePyridones

Identifiers

PMID33006999
PMCPMC7531795
OpenAlexW3090567217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.