Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33006997›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Couples data from north-western Tanzania: Insights from a survey of male partners of women enrolled in the MAISHA cluster randomized trial of an intimate partner violence prevention intervention.

Tanya Abramsky, Imma Kapinga, Gerry Mshana, Shelley Lees, Christian Holm Hansen, Ramadhan Hashim, Heidi Stöckl, Saidi Kapiga, Sheila Harvey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tanya AbramskyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-8492
Imma KapingaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Gerry MshanaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Shelley LeesDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Christian Holm HansenMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5949-0097
Ramadhan HashimMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Heidi StöcklDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Saidi KapigaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Sheila HarveyDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901756Medical Research Council MR/R00255X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally, around 30% of ever-partnered women have experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence (IPV) during their lifetime. To date, most research into causes and prevention of IPV involves surveys of women, with little research into risk-factors for male perpetration. This paper describes a survey of male partners of women participating in the MAISHA cluster randomised trial (CRT) of an IPV prevention intervention, in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Using linked couples' data, we explore man-, woman-, and relationship-/household-level factors associated with physical and sexual IPV.

methodsWomen were interviewed at baseline and 29-months follow-up. At follow-up, women were asked for consent to invite their partner to participate in the male survey. We describe response rates for the women's follow-up and male partners' surveys, and identify factors associated with women's consent to approach partners. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with women's past-year experiences of physical and sexual IPV.

results512 (65%) partnered women consented for the partner to be approached, higher among intervention than control women. 425 (83%) male partners were interviewed. Women consenting were disproportionately likely to be in longer-term relationships. Past-year IPV was associated with lower consent among control women, but greater consent in the intervention arm. Factors associated with increased odds of physical IPV were women's childhood experiences of abuse, young age, women's lower income and women's attitudes justifying IPV. Sexual IPV was associated with women's childhood experiences of abuse, young age, educational disparity within couple, men's alcohol use and women's poor mental health.

conclusionsWe successfully conducted a survey of male partners with the full consent of women trial participants. The breadth of factors associated with IPV demonstrates the need for IPV prevention interventions to work with women and men, and specifically couples. Interventions should address risk-factors for both physical and sexual IPV.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsSexual PartnersSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAge FactorsBehaviorCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33006997
PMCPMC7531846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.