Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33006003›Full record

Trial reportEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2021

A comprehensive mapping of outcomes following psychotherapy for adolescent depression: The perspectives of young people, their parents and therapists.

K Krause, N Midgley, J Edbrooke-Childs, M Wolpert

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Using large language models to detect outcomes in qualitative studies of adolescent depression.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Outcomes that Matter to Youth and Families in Behavioral Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K KrauseResearch Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury,, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. karolin.krause.16@ucl.ac.uk.
N MidgleyResearch Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury,, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
J Edbrooke-ChildsResearch Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury,, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
M WolpertResearch Department for Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury,, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.

Funding

Monument Trust MON5229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As mental health systems move towards person-centred care, outcome measurement in clinical research and practice should track changes that matter to young people and their families. This study mapped the types of change described by three key stakeholder groups following psychotherapy for depression, and compared the salience of these outcomes with the frequency of their measurement in recent quantitative treatment effectiveness studies for adolescent depression.Using qualitative content analysis, this study identified and categorized outcomes across 102 semi-structured interviews that were conducted with depressed adolescents, their parents, and therapists, as part of a randomized superiority trial. Adolescents had been allocated to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Short-Term Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, or a Brief Psychosocial Intervention.The study mapped seven high-level outcome domains and 29 outcome categories. On average, participants discussed change in four domains and six outcome categories. The most frequently discussed outcome was an improvement in mood and affect (i.e., core depressive symptoms), but close to half of the participants also described changes in family functioning, coping and resilience, academic functioning, or social functioning. Coping had specific importance for adolescents, while parents and therapists showed particular interest in academic functioning. There was some variation in the outcomes discussed beyond these core themes, across stakeholder groups and treatment arms.Of the outcomes that were frequently discussed in stakeholder narratives, only symptomatic change has been commonly reported in recent treatment studies for adolescent depression. A shift towards considering multiple outcome domains and perspectives is needed to reflect stakeholder priorities and enable more nuanced insights into change processes.

Indexed as

DepressionPsychotherapyAdolescentAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthHumansParentsTreatment OutcomeAdolescentsDepressionOutcomePatient perspectivesPsychotherapyQualitative

Identifiers

PMID33006003
PMCPMC8558204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.