ArticleHRB open research2020
A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage.
Article in HRB open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the efficacy and safety of SildenafilJournal of medicine and life · 2023Trial
- TRAF3 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for recurrent pregnancy loss: insights from single-cell transcriptomics and machine learning.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- A study of three-time-point dynamic changes in aPS/PT and standard aPL antibodies and their association with IVF pregnancy outcomes in APS-related recurrent pregnancy loss.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- High Prevalence of Anti-Prothrombin IgM and IgG Autoantibodies in Women With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews: A method for conducting comprehensive analysis.MethodsX · 2024Review
- Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies in Healthy Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy.HRB open research · 2021Article
- A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage.HRB open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.