ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020
Current status and trend of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07138859 (Prospective, Multiceter, Randomized, Controlled Study on the Intraoperative Technical Errors of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Radical Right Hemiclectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Multiceter, Randomized, Controlled Study on the Intraoperative Technical Errors of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Radical Right Hemiclectomy (Superiority Design，ROBOGEON® 2501study)
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of the "critical view/open book" concept for implementing standardized right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision-results from a series of minimally invasive surgical training courses.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Development of a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy training simulator: COLOMASTER.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- CC vs. CC-Plus: A Comparison between Two Cranial-to-Caudal Approaches for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Comparing cranial-caudal-medial and medial-lateral approaches for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Comparing extracorporeal, semi-extracorporeal, and intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: introducing a bridging technique for colorectal surgeons.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- Utility of articulating instruments as an alternative to robotic devices in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.International cancer conference journal · 2024Article
- Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023Review
- National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review of Varying Definitions and the Clinical Significance of Fredet's Fascia in the Era of Complete Mesocolic Excision.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- A propensity score matching study of totally robotic right hemicolectomy versus robot-assisted right hemicolectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- The value of mesenteric closure after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a scoping review.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with superior-to-inferior dissection: a mentee's initial experience.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2022Article
- Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic Surgery for Acute Diffuse Peritonitis Due to Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study Using the National Clinical Database.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Current status and trend of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020Review
- Isoperistaltic Side-to-side Anastomosis in Colorectal Surgery: Outcomes and Comparative Insights from Bahrain.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) is utilized worldwide as one of the standard surgical treatments for right-sided colon cancer. However, there have been issues concerning its applicability, techniques, and trend. The present study aimed to elucidate the current status and trend of LRH by reviewing literature focusing on important issues associated with this surgery. Based on previous studies, LRH most likely provides better short-term outcomes and similar oncological outcomes compared to open surgery. Despite the increasing use of robotic approach in this surgery, it seems to have always been associated with longer operative times and greater hospital cost with limited advantage. Intracorporeal anastomosis seems to improve short-term outcomes, such as quicker recovery of bowel function, compared to extracorporeal anastomosis. However, it does not contribute to shorter hospital stay. With regard to dissection technique, various approaches, and landmarks have been advocated to overcome the technical difficulty in LRH. This difficulty is likely to be caused by anatomical variation, especially in venous structures. The superiority of one approach or landmark over another is still argued about due to the lack of large-scale prospective studies. However, deep understanding both of anatomical variation and characteristics of each approach would be of extreme importance to minimize adverse effects and maximize patient benefit after LRH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.