Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005769›Full record

ArticleAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui)2020

Effect of different starch sources in a raw meat-based diet on fecal microbiome in dogs housed in a shelter.

Misa Sandri, Sandy Sgorlon, Elisa Scarsella, Bruno Stefanon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Factors Affecting Gut Microbiota of Puppies from Birth to Weaning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Misa SandriDepartment of AgriFood, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Sandy SgorlonDepartment of AgriFood, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Elisa ScarsellaDepartment of AgriFood, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Bruno StefanonDepartment of AgriFood, Environmental and Animal Science, University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A dietary intervention study was assessed to determine if different sources of starch in homemade diets could significantly modify fecal microbiome of dogs. Twenty-seven adult dogs were enrolled and fed a diet based on a mixture of rice and pasta with fresh raw meat (CD). After 90 d, 8 dogs continued to receive CD diet, 10 dogs received a diet made of a raw meat and a complementary food with rice as the main source of starch (B1), and 9 dogs were fed a diet with the same raw meat and a complementary food with potato as the main source of starch (B2). Samples of feces were collected from each dog in the mornings at the beginning of the study and after 15 d and analyzed for pH, ammonia N (N-NH

Indexed as

Canis lupus familiarisDietsMicrobiomeNutritionStarch fraction

Identifiers

PMID33005769
PMCPMC7503078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.