Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005730›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2020

Use of Ultrasound in Introducing Anatomical Pathology to Preclinical Medical Students, in Correlation with Physical Exam Curricula.

Lauren Trembley, Marek Radomski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren TrembleyClinical Instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.
Marek RadomskiAssistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound has become an important diagnostic tool in many clinical settings. Many medical schools have responded by incorporating instruction on ultrasound into the curriculum for medical students in their clinical years. The curriculum presented here will assist preclinical medical students in distinguishing between normal and pathologic sonographic anatomical findings. Methods: The course consisted of four, approximately 30-minute case-based PowerPoint slide shows introducing pathologic anatomical findings on ultrasound through clinical case-based scenarios. Twelve preclinical (first- and second-year) medical students attended each weekly session. An emergency medicine resident created and presented the course content as an adjunct to an established course instructing students on how ultrasound correlates to the normal physical exam. Upon completion of the course, the instructors emailed the students an online, seven-question survey. Results: Survey results showed positive feedback, with 71% of respondents answering Discussion: A curriculum which presents pathologic anatomical findings on ultrasound can be a useful tool in the education of preclinical medical students. Such a course enabled learners to more easily distinguish between normal and pathologic exam findings and introduced them to the many clinical uses of ultrasound at an earlier stage in their training, allowing them to develop this important skillset.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansPhysical ExaminationAnatomyPathologyPreclinical StudentsUltrasonographyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33005730
PMCPMC7521063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.