ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2020
Sclerosing Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Gland: A Potentially New Primary Entity.
Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 88-year-old man presented with diplopia, limitation of extraocular movements, and a firm palpable mass in the superolateral orbit. Biopsy revealed a sclerosing signet ring cell carcinoma with histopathologic features mimicking those of a primary signet ring cell (histiocytoid) carcinoma of the eyelid of eccrine or apocrine gland origin, a metastasis from an invasive lobular breast carcinoma or a metastatic diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. An extensive panel of immunohistochemical stains and molecular genetic analyses unequivocally failed to establish a precise diagnosis. Electron microscopy demonstrated features of a primary lacrimal gland lesion with intracytoplasmic lumens and zymogen granules typical of lacrimal secretory pyramidal cells. A thorough initial systemic work-up failed to reveal a primary visceral malignancy. Fifteen months of follow-up have failed to detect the emergence of another primary malignancy. To the best of our knowledge, a tumor with the morphology of the current lesion has not been previously described in the major or accessory lacrimal glands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.