ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2020
Exploring Graphene and MoS
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- MoSRSC advances · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial-nucleic acid probe synergy: accelerating rapid pathogen detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in bloodstream infections.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- A Tutorial Review on Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors: Applications in Biomedicine.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in MoSBiosensors · 2025Review
- The Tunable Parameters of Graphene-Based Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in Nanoplasmonic Biosensors: Optimizing Performance for Exosome Detection Applications.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Biosensing Platforms for Cardiac Biomarker Detection.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Unraveling the Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Mutations: Insights from Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor Kinetics.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Reviewing advances in nanophotonic biosensors.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Technology for Detecting Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Plasmonic Nanostructure Biosensors: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Ultrasensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor with a Feature of Dynamically Tunable Sensitivity and High Figure of Merit for Cancer Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Microfluidic preparation of optical sensors for biomedical applications.Smart medicine · 2023Review
- Optical Anisotropy and Excitons in MoSBiosensors · 2022Article
- Recent Advancements in Receptor Layer Engineering for Applications in SPR-Based Immunodiagnostics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Immunoassay-Amplified Responses Using a Functionalized MoSInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- Clinical Application for Screening Down's Syndrome by Using Carboxylated Graphene Oxide-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Aptasensors.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until now, two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have been widely studied and applied in the biosensor field. Some of the advantages offered by these 2D materials include large specific surface area, high conductivity, and easy surface modification. This review discusses the use of 2D material in surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor for diagnostic applications. Two-dimensional material reviewed includes graphene and molybdenum disulfide (MoS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.