Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005598›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020

Driving Under the Influence of Drugs: A Single Parallel Monitoring-Based Quantification Approach on Whole Blood.

Timothée Joye, Katell Rocher, Julien Déglon, Jonathan Sidibé, Bernard Favrat, Marc Augsburger, Aurélien Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothée JoyeForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katell RocherForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julien DéglonForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonathan SidibéForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bernard FavratUnit of Medicine and Traffic Psychology, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc AugsburgerForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aurélien ThomasForensic Toxicology and Chemistry Unit, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Centre of Legal Medicine · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driving under the influence of psychoactive substances is a major cause of motor vehicle crashes. The identification and quantification of substances most frequently involved in impaired-driving cases in a single analytic procedure could be an important asset in forensic toxicology. In this study, a highly sensitive and selective liquid chromatography (LC) approach hyphenated with Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was developed for the quantification of the main drugs present in the context of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) using 100 μL of whole blood. This procedure involves a simple sample preparation and benefit from the selectivity brought by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) allowing to solve most DUID cases using a single multi-analyte injection. The method was fully validated for the quantification of the major classes of psychoactive substances associated with impaired-driving (cannabinoids, cocaine and its metabolites, amphetamines, opiates and opioids, and the major benzodiazepines and z-drugs). The validation guidelines set by the "Société Française des Sciences et des Techniques Pharmaceutiques" (SFSTP) were respected for 22 psychoactive substances using 15 internal standards. Trueness was measured to be between 95.3 and 107.6% for all the tested concentrations. Precision represented by repeatability and intermediate precision was lower than 12% while recovery (RE) and matrix effect (ME) ranged from 49 to 105% and from -51 to 3%, respectively. The validated procedure provides an efficient approach for the simultaneous and simple quantification of the major drugs associated with impaired driving benefiting from the selectivity of PRM.

Indexed as

driving under the influence of drugsmulti-analyteparallel reaction monitoringquantitative analysiswhole blood

Identifiers

PMID33005598
PMCPMC7480261
OpenAlexW3090795230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.