Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005483›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Dissecting molecular network structures using a network subgraph approach.

Chien-Hung Huang, Efendi Zaenudin, Jeffrey J P Tsai, Nilubon Kurubanjerdjit, Eskezeia Y Dessie, Ka-Lok Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chien-Hung HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3905-8915
Efendi ZaenudinDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-4282
Jeffrey J P TsaiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Nilubon KurubanjerdjitSchool of Information Technology, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Eskezeia Y DessieDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9194-5816
Ka-Lok NgDepartment of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-6326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological processes are based on molecular networks, which exhibit biological functions through interactions of genetic elements or proteins. This study presents a graph-based method to characterize molecular networks by decomposing the networks into directed multigraphs: network subgraphs. Spectral graph theory, reciprocity and complexity measures were used to quantify the network subgraphs. Graph energy, reciprocity and cyclomatic complexity can optimally specify network subgraphs with some degree of degeneracy. Seventy-one molecular networks were analyzed from three network types: cancer networks, signal transduction networks, and cellular processes. Molecular networks are built from a finite number of subgraph patterns and subgraphs with large graph energies are not present, which implies a graph energy cutoff. In addition, certain subgraph patterns are absent from the three network types. Thus, the Shannon entropy of the subgraph frequency distribution is not maximal. Furthermore, frequently-observed subgraphs are irreducible graphs. These novel findings warrant further investigation and may lead to important applications. Finally, we observed that cancer-related cellular processes are enriched with subgraph-associated driver genes. Our study provides a systematic approach for dissecting biological networks and supports the conclusion that there are organizational principles underlying molecular networks.

Indexed as

Biological networksEntropyGraph theoryInformation theoryNetwork complexityNetwork motifsNetwork subgraphs

Identifiers

PMID33005483
PMCPMC7512139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.