ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020
Matching Misaligned Spectralis OCTs to a Reference Scan in Pediatric Glaucoma with Poor Fixation and Nystagmus.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Poor fixation or nystagmus in children causes misalignment errors when measuring circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness by simultaneous scanning laser ophthalmoscope imaging/optical coherence tomography (SLO/OCT). We investigated a method to assess cpRNFL from misaligned SLO/OCT scans. Methods: Heidelberg Spectralis SLO/OCT scans from a single clinical examination were retrospectively analyzed when automated eye tracking was unreliable. Retinal layer thickness was measured at overlapping match locations between a reference and misaligned scans based on the position data from simultaneously acquired SLO images. Three layers were segmented: cpRNFL, internal limiting membrane to outer nuclear layer (ILM-ONL), and total retinal thickness (TR). Accuracy was defined as the difference in thickness between the reference and misaligned scans at their match locations after correction for scan angle. Results: Thirty-five subjects, evaluated for glaucomatous nerve loss, met inclusion criteria. Group-averaged accuracy was -2.7, 1.4, and 0.3 µm for cpRNFL, ILM-ONL, and TR thickness, respectively. Across all layers, interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.97 to 0.63 and the maximum Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were -21.6 to 20.7 µm. Variability was greatest for cpRNFL thickness and least for TR thickness. Increased variability was associated with lower signal-to-noise ratio but not with image-motion indices of shear, rotation, and scale. Conclusions: Retinal layer thickness can be compared to a reference cpRNFL OCT scan when poor fixation and nystagmus causes misalignment errors. The analysis can be performed post hoc using multiple misaligned scans from standard SLO/OCT protocols. Translational Relevance: Our method allows for assessment of cpRNFL in children who fail eye tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.