Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005439›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2020

"We are the stakeholders with the most at stake": scientific and autism community co-researchers reflect on their collaborative experience in the CONNECT project.

Caroline Jose, Patricia George-Zwicker, Louise Tardif, Aaron Bouma, Darlene Pugsley, Luke Pugsley, Mathieu Bélanger, Jeffrey Gaudet, Marc Robichaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Annual Research Review: Shifting from 'normal science' to neurodiversity in autism science.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline JoseMaritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Patricia George-ZwickerAutistics Aloud, Halifax, NS Canada.
Louise TardifPatient partner, CONNECT project, Maritime Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Aaron BoumaPatient partner, CONNECT project, Maritime Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Darlene PugsleyPatient partner, CONNECT project, Maritime Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Luke PugsleyPatient partner, CONNECT project, Maritime Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Mathieu BélangerResearch Laboratory on Chronic Disease Prevention, Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, Moncton, NB Canada.
Jeffrey GaudetMaritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.
Marc RobichaudMaritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-7021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle research describes the everyday challenges and needs of autistic adults. In order to fill this data gap, the CONtiNuity of carE and support for autistiC adulTs (CONNECT) project set out to learn about the health and well-being of autistic adults as well as their service and support needs. To do so, CONNECT welcomed autistic adults and caregivers of autistic adults as members of the research team, alongside researchers, policy-makers, service providers and health professionals. Autistic adults were involved in every stage of the research project and participated in team meetings held several times a year as well as in numerous email exchanges.

methodsTwo feedback questionnaires were designed for this study: one for the scientific co-researchers and one for the autism community co-researchers (the project's "patient partners"). Although the surveys varied from one another, they probed respondents to provide critical and constructive comments on issues that were central to their engagement in CONNECT. Four scientific co-researchers and four autism community co-researchers filled out the questionnaires. A comparative analysis was carried out on the responses provided to the open- and closed-ended survey questions as well as on complimentary data collected from the team's documents.

resultsCONNECT was seen as a positive experience for both groups. Highlights included: helping tailor and design research and its relevant materials to better suit the needs of the autistic community; establishing relationships and creating long-lasting friendships with other autistic adults; gaining a better understanding of the research process; and forging new connections with regional, national and international stakeholders. Areas for improvement include: establishing clear roles, responsibilities and expectations from the start; outlining a strategy to address unforeseen changes in project leadership; and creating a platform allowing for the involvement and participation of a more representative sample of adults on the autism spectrum.

conclusionsWhile not without its challenges, CONNECT demonstrates that a collaborative multi-stakeholder approach engaging autistic adults can be an effective model for conducting research on adult autism. Autistic adults and their caregivers can make the research process more open and accessible and make its outputs more relevant, useful and meaningful to the wider autistic adult community.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum disorderCo-buildingCo-learningMulti-stakeholderPatient engagementPatient-oriented researchPatient partner

Identifiers

PMID33005439
PMCPMC7520966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.