Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005421›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2020

Karel Douda, Felipe Escobar-Calderón, Barbora Vodáková, Pavel Horký, Ondřej Slavík, Ronaldo Sousa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karel DoudaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Felipe Escobar-CalderónDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora VodákováDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel HorkýDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondřej SlavíkDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ronaldo SousaCBMA, Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple and low-cost method of monitoring and collecting particulate matter detaching from (or interacting with) aquatic animals is described using a novel device based on an airlift pump principle applied to floating cages. The efficiency of the technique in particle collection is demonstrated using polyethylene microspheres interacting with a cyprinid fish (

Indexed as

Aquatic animalsdrop-offfishfreshwater musselsglochidiahost–parasite relationshipsmicroparticlesmicroplastics

Identifiers

PMID33005421
PMCPMC7519624
OpenAlexW3088944328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.