Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005359›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Long-term persistence of wildlife populations in a pastoral area.

Christian Kiffner, John Kioko, Jack Baylis, Camille Beckwith, Craig Brunner, Christine Burns, Vasco Chavez-Molina, Sara Cotton, Laura Glazik, Ellen Loftis and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian KiffnerCenter for Wildlife Management Studies The School For Field Studies Karatu Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-9023
John KiokoCenter for Wildlife Management Studies The School For Field Studies Karatu Tanzania.
Jack BaylisDepartment of Environmental Studies and Sciences Santa Clara University Santa Clara CA USA.
Camille BeckwithBiology Department Wheaton College Norton MA USA.
Craig BrunnerPsychology Department Whitman College Walla Walla WA USA.
Christine BurnsDepartment of Environmental Science Dickinson College Carlisle PA USA.
Vasco Chavez-MolinaDepartment of Environmental Studies College of the Holy Cross Worcester MA USA.
Sara CottonNeuroscience and Behavior Department Vassar College Poughkeepsie NY USA.
Laura GlazikDepartment of Animal Science University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Champaign IL USA.
Ellen LoftisRubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont Burlington VT USA.
Megan MoranBiology Department College of the Holy Cross Worcester MA USA.
Caitlin O'NeillDepartment of Biology St. Mary's College of Maryland St. Mary's City MD USA.
Ole TheisingerCenter for Wildlife Management Studies The School For Field Studies Karatu Tanzania.
Bernard KissuiCenter for Wildlife Management Studies The School For Field Studies Karatu Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facilitating coexistence between people and wildlife is a major conservation challenge in East Africa. Some conservation models aim to balance the needs of people and wildlife, but the effectiveness of these models is rarely assessed. Using a case-study approach, we assessed the ecological performance of a pastoral area in northern Tanzania (Manyara Ranch) and established a long-term wildlife population monitoring program (carried out intermittently from 2003 to 2008 and regularly from 2011 to 2019) embedded in a distance sampling framework. By comparing density estimates of the road transect-based long-term monitoring to estimates derived from systematically distributed transects, we found that the bias associated with nonrandom placement of transects was nonsignificant. Overall, cattle and sheep and goat reached the greatest densities and several wildlife species occurred at densities similar (zebra, wildebeest, waterbuck, Kirk's dik-dik) or possibly even greater (giraffe, eland, lesser kudu, Grant's gazelle, Thomson's gazelle) than in adjacent national parks in the same ecosystem. Generalized linear mixed models suggested that most wildlife species (8 out of 14) reached greatest densities during the dry season, that wildlife population densities either remained constant or increased over the 17-year period, and that herbivorous livestock species remained constant, while domestic dog population decreased over time. Cross-species correlations did not provide evidence for interference competition between grazing or mixed livestock species and wildlife species but indicate possible negative relationships between domestic dog and warthog populations. Overall, wildlife and livestock populations in Manyara Ranch appear to coexist over the 17-year span. Most likely, this is facilitated by existing connectivity to adjacent protected areas, effective anti-poaching efforts, spatio-temporal grazing restrictions, favorable environmental conditions of the ranch, and spatial heterogeneity of surface water and habitats. This long-term case study illustrates the potential of rangelands to simultaneously support wildlife conservation and human livelihood goals if livestock grazing is restricted in space, time, and numbers.

Indexed as

coexistencecompetitionconservation effectivenessevidence‐based conservationfacilitationpopulation dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33005359
PMCPMC7520174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.