ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2020
Appendiceal mucocele: three cases with different clinical presentation and review of literature.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- When 'Mucocele' Isn't Just a Mucocele: Diagnostic Pathways and Surgical Management of Appendiceal Mucinous Lesions in a 10-Year Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Case Report: Synchronous primary high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and ovarian borderline mucinous cystadenoma: a rare case and diagnostic challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Appendiceal mucocele masquerading as an epithelial borderline ovarian tumor: A case report from Somalia.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Giant Appendiceal Mucocele with High Grade Mucinous Neoplasm-Case Report and Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimal Surgical Approaches for Incidentally Discovered Ruptured Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucinous lesions of appendix are a rare clinical entity and may be neoplastic or non-neoplastic. The diagnosis is usual incidental during computed tomography scan or colonoscopy performed for general abdominal symptoms or occasional finding during operation for acute appendicitis. For this reason, initial treatment should be tailored to the situation, aiming at complete resection of the appendix with disease-free margins: this can be achieved by simple appendectomy or more extensive resection. The pathological examination of the specimen is the key to offer the patient a correct and complete treatment, and, if a neoplastic pathology is found, the case should be discussed in multidisciplinary group. We describe three cases with different clinical presentation leading to different surgical treatment: one elective case, in which the diagnosis was suspected preoperatively; and two urgent cases, one mimicking an intussusception and another one presenting as an acute appendicitis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.