ArticlePrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2020
Incidence of genes encoding vanA/vanB vancomycin resistance in rectal swabs of patients with diagnosed cancer, on the day of admission to hospital, in a non-epidemic period.
Article in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of GeneXpert vanA/vanB in the early diagnosis of vancomycin-resistant enterococci infection.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRapid diagnosis is important for preventing infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
aimTo evaluate the status of gastrointestinal colonisation with strains containing vanA/vanB genes in oncological patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 167 samples of rectal swabs taken from 161 patients (mean age: 63, range: 29-93 years) were examined, including 113 patients from surgical wards (70.2%) and 48 patients from non-surgical wards (29.8%), with diagnosed cancer. The tests were carried out within 24 h of admitting the patient to the department, using the Cepheid Xpert vanA/vanB test, with a CE marked GeneXpert
resultsThe presence of the vanA gene was found in 2.7% and 6.3% of the examined patients, respectively, from the surgical and non-surgical departments, which accounted for 3.7% of all the patients examined. The presence of the vanB gene was detected in 21.1% of the patients, but in no case was there any growth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the chromogenic medium.
conclusionsPatients admitted to non-surgical wards were more often colonised with vanA/vanB genes than were patients admitted to surgical wards, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.