ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2020
Male Contraception.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why male contraception still stalls: translational, social, and ethical gaps.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Alpha-Adrenoceptor Blockade as a Novel Pathway Toward Non-Hormonal Male Contraception: A Mechanistic and Clinical Evidence Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Reviewing the Implication of Aldehyde Dehydrogenases in Male Reproduction: Prospects for New Therapeutic Approaches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Progestins - a review of clinical application in gynecology.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Contraception in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Pharmacological Review.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Traditional contraceptive practices: survey of medicinal plants used to control birth in four states in Nigeria.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Vasectomy Procedures on the Rise in France From 2010 to 2022.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Male Hormonal Contraception-Current Stage of Knowledge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Kidney disease and reproductive health.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Medicinal plant species used for contraception and reproductive health care in rural Uganda.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Prevalence of vasectomy and tubal ligation: time series analysis Brazil, 2006-2019.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Hormone Regulation in Testicular Development and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Reversible Contraception in Males: An Obtainable Target?Biology · 2024Review
- Interactions of the male contraceptive target EPPIN with semenogelin-1 and small organic ligands.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Interpretation of Steroid Biomarkers in 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency and Their Use in Disease Management.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Review
- Non-Hormonal Contraception.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- On-demand male contraception via acute inhibition of soluble adenylyl cyclase.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unintended pregnancy is a global public health problem. Despite a variety of female contraceptive options, male contraceptive options are limited to the condom and vasectomy. Condoms have high failure rates and surgical vasectomy is not reliably reversible. There is a global need and desire for novel male contraceptive methods. Hormonal methods have progressed the furthest in clinical development and androgen plus progestin formulations hold promise as a marketable, reversible male contraceptive over the next decade. Investigators have tested androgen plus progestin approaches using oral, transdermal, subdermal, and injectable drug formulations and demonstrated the short-term safety and reversibility of hormonal male contraception. The most commonly reported side effects associated with hormonal male contraception include weight gain, acne, slight suppression of serum high-density cholesterol, mood changes, and changes in libido. Efficacy trials of hormonal male contraceptives have demonstrated contraceptive efficacy rates greater than that of condoms. Although there has been less progression in the development of nonhormonal male contraceptives, potentially reversible vaso-occlusive methods are currently in clinical trials in some countries. Various studies have confirmed both men and women's desire for novel male contraceptives. Barriers to development include an absence of investment from pharmaceutical companies, concerns regarding side effects and spermatogenic rebound with hormonal methods, and lack of clear reversibility and proven effectiveness of nonhormonal methods. The ultimate availability of male contraceptives could have an important impact on decreasing global unintended pregnancy rates (currently 40% of all pregnancies) and will be a step towards reproductive justice and greater equity in family planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33005125PMC7513428What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.