Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33005091›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2020

Assessing spatial and temporal biases and gaps in the publicly available distributional information of Iberian mosses.

Cristina Ronquillo, Fernanda Alves-Martins, Vicente Mazimpaka, Thadeu Sobral-Souza, Bruno Vilela-Silva, Nagore G Medina, Joaquín Hortal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina RonquilloDept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain Dept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC) Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-5147
Fernanda Alves-MartinsDept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain Dept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC) Madrid Spain.
Vicente MazimpakaDept. Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Dept. Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain.
Thadeu Sobral-SouzaDept. Botanica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiaba, Brazil Dept. Botanica e Ecologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT) Cuiaba Brazil.
Bruno Vilela-SilvaInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia. 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina, Salvador, Brazil Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia. 1154, R. Barão de Jeremoabo, 668 - Ondina Salvador Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4072-0558
Nagore G MedinaDept. Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Dept. Biología (Botánica), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain.
Joaquín HortalDept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain Dept. Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC) Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-8877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most valuable initiatives on massive availability of biodiversity data is the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, which is creating new opportunities to develop and test macroecological knowledge. However, the potential uses of these data are limited by the gaps and biases associated to large-scale distributional databases (the so-called Wallacean shortfall). Describing and quantifying these limitations are essential to improve knowledge on biodiversity, especially in poorly-studied groups, such as mosses. Here we assess the coverage of the publicly-available distributional information on Iberian mosses, defining its eventual biases and gaps. For this purpose, we compiled IberBryo v1.0, a database that comprises 82,582 records after processing and checking the geospatial and taxonomical information. Our results show the limitations of data and metadata of the publicly-available information. Particularly, ca. 42% of the records lacked collecting date information, which limits data usefulness for time coverage analyses and enlarges the existing knowledge gaps. Then we evaluated the overall coverage of several aspects of the spatial, temporal and environmental variability of the Iberian Peninsula. Through this assessment, we demonstrate that the publicly-available information on Iberian mosses presents significant biases. Inventory completeness is strongly conditioned by the recorders' survey bias, particularly in northern Portugal and eastern Spain and the spatial pattern of surveys is also biased towards mountains. Besides, the temporal pattern of survey effort intensifies from 1970 onwards, encompassing a progressive increase in the geographic coverage of the Iberian Peninsula. Although we just found 5% of well-surveyed cells of 30' of resolution over the 1970-2018 period, they cover about a fifth of the main climatic gradients of the Iberian Peninsula, which provides a fair - though limited - coverage. Yet, the well-surveyed cells are biased towards anthropised areas and some of them are located in areas under intense land-use changes, mainly due to the wood-fires of the last decade. Despite the overall increase, we found a noticeable gap of information in the south-west of Iberia, the Ebro river basin and the inner plateaus. All these gaps and biases call for a careful use of the available distributional data of Iberian mosses for biogeographical and ecological modelling analysis. Further, our results highlight the necessity of incorporating several good practices to increase the coverage of high-quality information. These good practices include digitalisation of specimens and metadata information, improvement on the protocols to get accurate data and metadata or revisions of the vouchers and recorders' field notebooks. These procedures are essential to improve the quality and coverage of the data. Finally, we also encourage Iberian bryologists to establish a series of re-surveys of classical localities that would allow updating the information on the group, as well as to design their future surveys considering the most important information gaps on IberBryo.

Indexed as

Biodiversity dataBryophytaGlobal Biodiversity Information FacilityIberBryoIberian PeninsulaInventory completenessWallacean Shortfall

Identifiers

PMID33005091
PMCPMC7508938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.