ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021
3-Year results following treatment with the second generation of the temporary implantable nitinol device in men with LUTS secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05440981 (The Use of Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of Temporarily Implanted Nitinol Device (iTind) System in Chinese Male Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complication rate across the minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs): where do we stand? A systematic review of the literature.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Reintervention rates after minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia therapies: a systematic review including industry involvement.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Prostatic stents: a systematic review and analysis of functional outcomes and complication rate.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Ejaculation sparing of classic and minimally invasive surgical treatments of LUTS/BPH.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of minimally invasive surgical procedures for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia on ejaculatory function: a systematic review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- [Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Guideline
- Sexual and urinary outcomes of minimally invasive surgical therapies for LUTS/BPH: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Review
- The impact of minimally invasive surgical therapy for Benign prostatic hyperplasia on sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- State-of-the-art in minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic obstruction.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Review
- Use of a Schelin catheter for transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) prior to iTIND procedure.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgical treatments for male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic enlargement: A review on sexual function outcomes.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Long-term outcomes after treatment with Optilume BPH Four-year results from the EVEREST study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Recent Advancements in Prostate Catheters and Stents for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea?Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Primary bladder neck obstruction in men-new perspectives in physiopathology.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Review
- A scoping review of office-based prostatic stents: past, present, and future of true minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Six novel minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.Central European journal of urology · 2023Article
- Updates on Preprocedural Evaluation and Patient Selection for Prostatic Artery Embolization.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo report the 3-year results of a prospective, single arm, multicenter, international clinical study with the second generation of the temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND; Medi-Tate Ltd®, Israel) on men suffering lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
methodsEighty-one men with symptomatic BPO (IPSS ≥ 10, peak urinary flow <12 ml/s, and prostate volume <75 ml) were enrolled in this study between December 2014 and December 2016. Subjects were washed-out 1 month for alpha-blockers and 6 months for 5-ARIs. The implantation was performed under light sedation and the removal 5-7 days later with topical anesthesia. Perioperative results including OR-time, pain (VAS) postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo-Grading System), functional results (Qmax, IPSS, PVR) and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years. Sexual and ejaculatory function were evaluated using two yes/no questions.
resultsThirty-six month functional results were available for 50 patients and demonstrated that iTIND efficacy remained stable through 3 years, with averages IPSS, QOL, Qmax and PVR of 8.55 + 6.38, 1.76 + 1.32, 15.2 + 6.59 ml/s and 9.38 + 17.4 ml, improved from baseline by -58.2, -55.6, +114.7, and -85.4% (all significantly different from their corresponding baseline values, p < 0.0001). Even considering the Intention to Treat analysis (ITT), the 36-month results confirmed significant improvements of the functional outcomes if compared with baselines values (all p < 0.0001). No late post-operative complications were observed between 12 and 36 months. Sexual function was stable through 3 years, with no reports of sexual or ejaculatory dysfunctions. No patients underwent alternative treatments between 24 and 36 months.
conclusionTreatment of BPO-related LUTS with iTIND demonstrated a significant and durable reduction in symptoms and improvement of functional parameters and quality of life at 3 years of follow-up. No late post-operative complications, ejaculatory dysfunction or additional treatment failures were observed between 24 and 36 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.