Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Quantifying the effect of human practices on S. cerevisiae vineyard metapopulation diversity.

Marine Börlin, Olivier Claisse, Warren Albertin, Franck Salin, Jean-Luc Legras, Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marine BörlinUR Oenologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier ClaisseUR Oenologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Warren AlbertinUR Oenologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Franck SalinUMR Biodiversité Gènes et Ecosystèmes, Plateforme Génomique, INRAE, Cestas, France.
Jean-Luc LegrasSPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France. jean-luc.legras@inrae.fr.
Isabelle Masneuf-PomaredeUR Oenologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRAE, Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. isabelle.masneuf@agro-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the main actor of wine fermentation but at present, still little is known about the factors impacting its distribution in the vineyards. In this study, 23 vineyards and 7 cellars were sampled over 2 consecutive years in the Bordeaux and Bergerac regions. The impact of geography and farming system and the relation between grape and vat populations were evaluated using a collection of 1374 S. cerevisiae merlot grape isolates and 289 vat isolates analyzed at 17 microsatellites loci. A very high genetic diversity of S. cerevisiae strains was obtained from grape samples, higher in conventional farming system than in organic one. The geographic appellation and the wine estate significantly impact the S. cerevisiae population structure, whereas the type of farming system has a weak global effect. When comparing cellar and vineyard populations, we evidenced the tight connection between the two compartments, based on the high proportion of grape isolates (25%) related to the commercial starters used in the cellar and on the estimation of bidirectional geneflows between the vineyard and the cellar compartments.

Indexed as

BiodiversityHuman ActivitiesDNA, FungalFarmsFermentationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeVitisDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID33004911
PMCPMC7530672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.