Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004830›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A computational guided, functional validation of a novel therapeutic antibody proposes Notch signaling as a clinical relevant and druggable target in glioma.

Dayana Herrera-Rios, Guanzhang Li, Dilaware Khan, Julia Tsiampali, Ann-Christin Nickel, Philippe Aretz, Michael Hewera, Abiagail Kora Suwala, Tao Jiang, Hans-Jakob Steiger and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomaterial-basedCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dayana Herrera-Rios *Neurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Guanzhang Li *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dilaware KhanNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Julia TsiampaliNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Ann-Christin NickelNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Philippe AretzNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Michael HeweraNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Abiagail Kora SuwalaDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tao JiangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hans-Jakob SteigerNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Marcel Alexander KampNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Sajjad MuhammadNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Daniel HänggiNeurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jarek MaciaczykDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Wei Zhang *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ulf Dietrich Kahlert *Neurosurgical Clinic, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany. mail@ulf-kahlert.com.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DECapital Medical University · CNGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Notch signaling network determines stemness in various tissues and targeting signaling activity in malignant brain cancers by gamma-secretase inhibitors (GSI) has shown promising preclinical success. However, the clinical translation remains challenging due to severe toxicity side effects and emergence of therapy resistance. Better anti-Notch directed therapies, specifically directed against the tumor promoting Notch receptor 1 signaling framework, and biomarkers predicting response to such therapy are of highest clinical need. We assessed multiple patient datasets to probe the clinical relevance Notch1 activation and possible differential distribution amongst molecular subtypes in brain cancers. We functionally assessed the biological effects of the first-in-human tested blocking antibody against Notch1 receptor (brontictuzumab, BRON) in a collection of glioma stem-like cell (GSC) models and compared its effects to genetic Notch1 inhibition as well as classical pharmacological Notch inhibitor treatment using gamma-secretase inhibitor MRK003. We also assess effects on Wingless (WNT) stem cell signaling activation, which includes the interrogation of genetic WNT inhibition models. Our computed transcriptional Notch pathway activation score is upregulated in neural stem cells, as compared to astrocytes; as well as in GSCs, as compared to differentiated glioblastoma cells. Moreover, the Notch signature is clinical predictive in our glioblastoma patient discovery and validation cohort. Notch signature is significantly increased in tumors with mutant IDH1 genome and tumors without 1p and 19q co-deletion. In GSCs with elevated Notch1 expression, BRON treatment blocks transcription of Notch pathway target genes Hes1/Hey1, significantly reduced the amount of cleaved Notch1 receptor protein and caused significantly impairment of cellular invasion. Benchmarking this phenotype to those observed with genetic Notch1 inhibition in corresponding cell models did result in higher reduction of cell invasion under chemotherapy. BRON treatment caused signs of upregulation of Wingless (WNT) stem cell signaling activity, and vice versa, blockage of WNT signaling caused induction of Notch target gene expression in our models. We extend the list of evidences that elevated Notch signal expression is a biomarker signature declaring stem cell prevalence and useful for predicting negative clinical course in glioblastoma. By using functional assays, we validated a first in man tested Notch1 receptor specific antibody as a promising drug candidate in the context of neuro oncology and propose biomarker panel to predict resistance and therapy success of this treatment option. We note that the observed phenotype seems only in part due to Notch1 blockage and the drug candidate leads to activation of off target signals. Further studies addressing a possible emergence of therapy resistance due to WNT activation need to be conducted. We further validated our 3D disease modeling technology to be of benefit for drug development projects.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBrain NeoplasmsComputational BiologyGliomaHumansNeural Stem CellsReceptor, Notch1Tumor Cells, CulturedAntibodies, MonoclonalNOTCH1 protein, humanReceptor, Notch1

Identifiers

PMID33004830
PMCPMC7531005
OpenAlexW3090944706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.