Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004550›Full record

ArticleGut2021

Thiopurine monotherapy is effective in ulcerative colitis but significantly less so in Crohn's disease: long-term outcomes for 11 928 patients in the UK inflammatory bowel disease bioresource.

Evangelos Stournaras, Wendi Qian, Apostolos Pappas, You Yi Hong, Rasha Shawky, UK IBD BioResource Investigators, Tim Raine, Miles Parkes, UK IBD Bioresource Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerium single-atom catalysts-armedActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Choosing Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evangelos Stournaras *Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-0673
Wendi Qian *Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Apostolos PappasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
You Yi HongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Rasha ShawkyIBD BioResource, NIHR BioResource, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
UK IBD BioResource Investigators
Tim Raine *Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Miles Parkes *Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK mp372@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6467-0631
UK IBD Bioresource Investigators
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health 20664Medical Research Council MC_PC_19003Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/S025952/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_12010/7Medical Research Council MR/M00533X/1Medical Research Council MR/S036377/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThiopurines are widely used as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but the evidence base for their use is sparse and their role increasingly questioned. Using the largest series reported to date, we assessed the long-term effectiveness of thiopurines in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), including their impact on need for surgery.

designOutcomes were assessed in 11 928 patients (4968 UC, 6960 CD) in the UK IBD BioResource initiated on thiopurine monotherapy with the intention of maintaining medically induced remission. Effectiveness was assessed retrospectively using patient-level data and a definition that required avoidance of escalation to biological therapy or surgery while on thiopurines. Analyses included overall effectiveness, time-to-event analysis for treatment escalation and comparison of surgery rates in patients tolerant or intolerant of thiopurines.

resultsUsing 68 132 patient-years of exposure, thiopurine monotherapy appeared effective for the duration of treatment in 2617/4968 (52.7%) patients with UC compared with 2378/6960 (34.2%) patients with CD (p<0.0001). This difference was corroborated in a multivariable analysis: after adjusting for variables including treatment era, thiopurine monotherapy was less effective in CD than UC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.51, p<0.0001). Thiopurine intolerance was associated with increased risk of surgery in UC (HR 2.44, p<0.0001); with a more modest impact on need for surgery in CD (HR=1.23, p=0.0015).

conclusionThiopurine monotherapy is an effective long-term treatment for UC but significantly less effective in CD.

Indexed as

AdultAzathioprineColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansMaleMercaptopurineOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomAzathioprineGastrointestinal AgentsMercaptopurine6-mercaptopurineazathioprinecrohn's diseasetoleranceulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID33004550
PMCPMC7948184
OpenAlexW3089548110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.