Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004166›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2020

Occupational burnout syndrome and post-traumatic stress among healthcare professionals during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Jaroslava Raudenská, Veronika Steinerová, Alena Javůrková, Ivan Urits, Alan D Kaye, Omar Viswanath, Giustino Varrassi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Employee Perceptions of a Clinical Department's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Validity Evidence for the Secondary Symptoms of the Burnout Assessment Tool: A Brazilian Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaroslava RaudenskáDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Department of Nursing, 2nd Medical School and University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Veronika SteinerováMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences at the University of Melbourne, Australia.
Alena JavůrkováDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Department of Nursing, 2nd Medical School and University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivan UritsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Omar ViswanathDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA; Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology Phoenix, AZ, USA; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Fdn, Via Tacito 7, 00193, Roma, Italy; World Institute of Pain, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: giuvarr@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive review aims to explain the potential impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on mental wellbeing of healthcare professionals (HCPs). Based on up-to-date research and psychological diagnostic manuals of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition and International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision, we describe associated psychological disorders and experiences that may arise related to COVID-19. Appropriate psychological measures are introduced, along with potential methodological limitations. Lastly, resilience building and preventative measures with interventions that may mitigate the impact on mental health of HCPs are described.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBurnout, ProfessionalCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Stress Disorders, Post-Traumaticburnout syndromeCOVID-19 pandemichealthcare practitionersmental healthpost-traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID33004166
PMCPMC7367798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.