Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004164›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2020

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain management: Looking for the best way to deliver care.

Filomena Puntillo, Mariateresa Giglio, Nicola Brienza, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alan D Kaye, Joseph Pergolizzi, Antonella Paladini, Giustino Varrassi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Musculoskeletal and Neuropathic Pain in COVID-19.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Vaccine hesitancy in patients with COVID-19 who have back pain.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Filomena PuntilloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Mariateresa GiglioAnesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Unit, Policlinico Hospital, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Nicola BrienzaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Omar ViswanathValley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE, USA; Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Ivan UritsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alan D KayeLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Joseph PergolizziNEMA Res Group, Naples, FL, USA.
Antonella PaladiniDepartment of MESVA, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Fdn, Via Tacito 7, 00193 Roma, Italy; World Institute of Pain, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. Electronic address: giuvarr@gmail.com.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCreighton University · USFondazione Roma · ITLouisiana State University in Shreveport · USNema Research (United States) · USUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pain treatment has been described as a fundamental human right, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced healthcare systems worldwide to redistribute healthcare resources toward intensive care units and other COVID-19 dedicated sites. As most chronic pain services were subsequently deemed non-urgent, all outpatient and elective interventional procedures have been reduced or interrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to reduce the risk of viral spread. The shutdown of pain services jointly to the home lockdown imposed by governments has affected chronic pain management worldwide with additional impact on patients' psychological health. Therefore, the aim of this review is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain treatment and to address what types of strategies can be implemented or supported in order to overcome imposed limitations in delivery of chronic pain patient care.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusChronic PainCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPain ManagementPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2chronic painCOVID-19interventional paintelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33004164
PMCPMC7366114
OpenAlexW3042685078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.