Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004054›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2020

Production and identification of two antifungal terpenoids from the Posidonia oceanica epiphytic Ascomycota Mariannaea humicola IG100.

Lorenzo Botta, Raffaele Saladino, Paolo Barghini, Massimiliano Fenice, Marcella Pasqualetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenzo BottaDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Raffaele SaladinoDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Paolo BarghiniDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Massimiliano FeniceDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Marcella PasqualettiDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy. mpasqual@unitus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-5596
Università degli Studi della Tuscia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarine fungi are an important repository of bioactive molecules with great potential in different technological fields, the annual number of new compounds isolated from marine fungi is impressive and the general trend indicates that it is still on the rise. In this context, the antifungal and antimicrobial activity of the marine strain Mariannaea humicola IG100 was evaluated and two active terpenoids were isolated and characterized.

methodsPreliminary screening of activity of marine strain IG100 was carried out by agar plug diffusion methods against fungal (Penicillium griseofulvum TSF04) and bacterial (Bacillus pumilus KB66 and Escherichia coli JM109) strains. Subsequently, inhibition tests were done by using the cultural broth and the organic extract (ethyl acetate, EtOAc) by the agar well diffusion methods. The main active fractions were identified and tested for their antifungal activity against P. griseofulvum TSF04 in a 24 wells microplate at different concentrations (1000, 100, 10 and 1.0 µg/mL). Two active compounds were characterized and their relative MIC measured by the broth micro-dilution methods in a 96-well microplate against Aspergillus flavus IG133, P. griseofulvum TSF04, and Trichoderma pleuroticola IG137.

resultsMarine strain IG100 presented significant antifungal activity associated with two active compounds, the terpenoids terperstacin 1 and 19-acetyl-4-hydroxydictyodiol 2. Their MIC values were measured for A. flavus (MIC of 7.9 µg/mL and 31.3 µg/mL for 1 and 2, respectively), P. griseofulvum (MIC of 25 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL for 1 and 2, respectively) and T. pleuroticola (MIC > 500 µg/mL and 125 µg/mL for 1 and 2, respectively). They showed a rather good fungistatic effect.

conclusionsIn this study, the first marine strain of M. humicola (IG100) was investigated for the production of bioactive molecules. Strain IG100 produced significant amounts of two bioactive terpenoids, terperstacin 1 and 19-acetyl-4-hydroxydictyodiol 2. The two compounds showed significant antifungal activities against A. flavus IG133, T. pleuroticola IG137 and P. griseofulvum TSF04. Compound 2 was identified for the first time in fungi.

Indexed as

AlismatalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAspergillus flavusBacillus pumilusBridged Bicyclo CompoundsChromatographyEscherichia coliHypocrealesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicilliumPhylogenyTerpenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsBridged Bicyclo CompoundsTerpenesterpestacinantifungal activityfungal xenicanesMariannaea humicolamarine fungiterpestacin

Identifiers

PMID33004054
PMCPMC7528228
OpenAlexW3090153518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.