Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004049›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2020

Long-term impact of undergraduate community-based clinical training on community healthcare practice in Japan: a cross-sectional study.

Shinsuke Yahata, Taro Takeshima, Tsuneaki Kenzaka, Masanobu Okayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Contribution of Citizens to Community-Based Medical Education in Japan: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nurses' Contributions in Rural Family Medicine Education: A Mixed-Method Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shinsuke YahataDivision of Community Medicine and Medical Education, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-5, Arata-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 652-0032, Japan.
Taro TakeshimaDepartment of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching and Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1, Toyochikamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, 961-0005, Japan.
Tsuneaki KenzakaDivision of Community Medicine and Career Development, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-5, Arata-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 652-0032, Japan.
Masanobu OkayamaDivision of Community Medicine and Medical Education, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-5, Arata-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 652-0032, Japan. okayamam@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-5373

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP16K08870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based medical education (CBME) has been evolving globally. However, the long-term impacts of CBME programs on career intention are ambiguous. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the long-term impact of community-based clinical training (CBCT) such as CBME programs in Japan on current community healthcare (CH) practice.

methodsThis cross-sectional study targeted physicians who had graduated from Kobe University School of Medicine between 1998 and 2004 and had over 15 years' experience after graduation. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to participants between September and November 2019. Of the 793 potential subjects, 325 questionnaires were undeliverable. A total of 468 questionnaires substantially sent to the subjects. The exposure was the undergraduate CBCT defined as clinical training about CH in a community. The primary outcome was the provision of current CH practice. The secondary outcome was rural retention. The odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and the confounders (age, gender, and attitude toward CH at admission; primary outcome, and age, gender, attitude toward rural healthcare at admission, own and spouse's hometown, and emphasis on child education; secondary outcomes) were adjusted using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsA total of 195 (41.7%) questionnaires were analyzed. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of study participants was 43.8 (3.5) years and 76.4% were men. A total of 48 physicians (24.6%) experienced CBCT, of which the mean (SD) training period was 26.3 (27.3) days. As many as 148 (76.3%) physicians provided CH at the time of the study, and 12 (6.5%) worked in rural areas. There was no notable impact of undergraduate CBCT on current CH practice (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.53-3.08; adjusted OR [aOR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.43-2.30) and rural retention (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.06-2.94; aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.11-3.04).

conclusionsIt may be insufficient to use conventional CBCT in Japan to develop CH professionals effectively. Japanese CBME programs should be standardized through a review of their content and quality. They should continue to be evaluated for their medium- to long-term effects.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateRural Health ServicesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceChildCommunity Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleProfessional Practice LocationSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical trainingCommunity-based medical educationCommunity healthcareRuralUndergraduate

Identifiers

PMID33004049
PMCPMC7528470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.