Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004033›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Analytical performance evaluation of a commercial next generation sequencing liquid biopsy platform using plasma ctDNA, reference standards, and synthetic serial dilution samples derived from normal plasma.

Suman Verma, Mathew W Moore, Rebecca Ringler, Abhisek Ghosal, Kyle Horvath, Theodore Naef, Sheri Anvari, Philip D Cotter, Shelly Gunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Esophageal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suman VermaResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA. sverma@researchdx.com.
Mathew W MooreResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Rebecca RinglerResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Abhisek GhosalResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Kyle HorvathResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Theodore NaefResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sheri AnvariResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Philip D CotterResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Shelly GunnResearchDx, Inc., 5 Mason, Irvine, CA, USA.
Pacific Clinical Research · US

Funding

Roche Diagnostics (PLE for CAP-Seq)/RD003387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor (ct) DNA assays performed in clinical laboratories provide tumor biomarker testing support for biopharmaceutical clinical trials. Yet it is neither practical nor economically feasible for many of these clinical laboratories to internally develop their own liquid biopsy assay. Commercially available ctDNA kits are a potential solution for laboratories seeking to incorporate liquid biopsy into their test menus. However, the scarcity of characterized patient samples and cost of purchasing validation reference standards creates a barrier to entry. In the current study, we evaluated the analytical performance of the AVENIO ctDNA liquid biopsy platform (Roche Sequencing Solutions) for use in our clinical laboratory.

methodIntra-laboratory performance evaluation of AVENIO ctDNA Targeted, Expanded, and Surveillance kits (Research Use Only) was performed according to College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines for the validation of targeted next generation sequencing assays using purchased reference standards, de-identified human plasma cell-free (cf) DNA samples, and contrived samples derived from commercially purchased normal and cancer human plasma. All samples were sequenced at read depths relevant to clinical settings using the NextSeq High Output kit (Illumina).

resultsAt the clinically relevant read depth, Avenio ctDNA kits demonstrated 100% sensitivity in detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs) at ≥0.5% allele frequency (AF) and 50% sensitivity in detecting SNVs at 0.1% AF using 20-40 ng sample input amount. The assay integrated seamlessly into our laboratory's NGS workflow with input DNA mass, target allele frequency (TAF), multiplexing, and number of reads optimized to support a high-throughput assay appropriate for biopharmaceutical trials.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that AVENIO ctDNA liquid biopsy platform provides a viable alternative for efficient incorporation of liquid biopsy assays into the clinical laboratory for detecting somatic alterations as low as 0.5%. Accurate detection of variants lower than 0.5% could potentially be achieved by deeper sequencing when clinically indicated and economically feasible.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNActDNALiquid biopsyNGSTumor biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33004033
PMCPMC7528227
OpenAlexW3091138491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.