ArticleBMC palliative care2020
Views of advanced cancer patients, families, and oncologists on initiating and engaging in advance care planning: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Experiences and perspectives of older adults in nursing homes and their families participating in advance care planning: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC palliative care · 2025Pooled it
- Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC palliative care · 2023Pooled it
- Experiences with implementing advance care planning (ACP-GP) in Belgian general practice in the context of a cluster RCT: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.BMC primary care · 2024Trial
- Article
- Measurement instruments in advance care planning: A systematic review of psychometric properties.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Emergency nurses' perspectives on advance care planning and their role in end-of-life decision-making: a focus group study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- What is the appropriate timing for advance care planning according to patients and their relatives? A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- Advance care planning in haematological malignancies: A qualitative exploratory analysis of the facilitators and barriers to implementing advance care planning in practice.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- The ethical dimensions of utilizing Artificial Intelligence in palliative care.Nursing ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Having hard conversations: Advance care planning, serious illness conversations, and goals of care discussions with oncology patients.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled social media listening to inform early patient-focused drug development: perspectives on approaches and strategies.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Patient Engagement With Early Stage Advance Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale in a German hospital setting.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Qualitative Study of Clinician Perspectives Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Time of Clinic Appointment and Serious Illness Communication in Oncology.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process by which patients reflect upon their goals, values and beliefs to allow them to make decisions about their future medical treatment that align with their goals and values, improving patient-centered care. Despite this, ACP is underutilized and is reported as one of the most difficult processes of oncology. We sought to: 1) explore patients' and families' understanding, experience and reflections on ACP, as well as what they need from their physicians during the process; 2) explore physicians' views of ACP, including their experiences with initiating ACP and views on ACP training.
methodsThis was a qualitative descriptive study in Nova Scotia, Canada with oncologists, advanced cancer out-patients and their family members. Semi-structured interviews with advanced cancer out-patients and their family members (n = 4 patients, 4 family members) and oncologists (n = 10) were conducted; each participant was recruited separately. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis, which entailed coding, categorizing, and identifying themes recurrent across the datasets.
resultsThemes were identified from the patient / family and oncologist groups, four and five respectively. Themes from patients / families included: 1) positive attitudes towards ACP; 2) healthcare professionals (HCPs) lack an understanding of patients' and families' informational needs during the ACP process; 3) limited access to services and supports; and 4) poor communication between HCPs. Themes from oncologists included: 1) initiation of ACP discussions; 2) navigating patient-family dynamics; 3) limited formal training in ACP; 4) ACP requires a team approach; and 5) lack of coordinated systems hinders ACP.
conclusionsStakeholders believe ACP for advanced cancer patients is important. Patients and families desire earlier and more in-depth discussion of ACP, additional services and supports, and improved communication between their HCPs. In the absence of formal training or guidance, oncologists have used clinical acumen to initiate ACP and a collaborative healthcare team approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.