ReviewBMC public health2020
Examining the application of behaviour change theories in the context of infectious disease outbreaks and emergency response: a review of reviews.
Review in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Factors associated with COVID-19 preventive health behaviors among the general public in Mexico City and the State of Mexico.PloS one · 2021Trial
- A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response.Perspectives in public health · 2026Article
- Are we asking the right questions? A dive into the knowledge, attitudes, and practices literature on behavior change in tick bite prevention.BMC public health · 2026Review
- Quantitative analysis of self-reporting and contact tracing in heterogeneous risk groups: a stochastic modeling study of the COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu, Korea.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Understanding the interplay between epidemiological and social cognitve drivers of behaviour change during the Covid-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating behavioural science and epidemiology to improve early detection of zoonotic swine influenza in the Netherlands.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Applications of Behavioral Change Theories and Models in Health Promotion Interventions: A Rapid Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- "I definitely cannot afford to be feeling poorly if there's no need to be": a qualitative evaluation of antiviral uptake following suspected occupational exposure to avian influenza.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Inferring human behavior through online social networks may provide accurate behavioral estimates for outbreak forecasting of arboviruses.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Exploring barriers to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe: a qualitative study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- People with long-term conditions are more adherent to protective behaviours against infectious disease.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A scoping review of modifiable and behavioural drivers of infectious gastroenteritis among children in high-income countries.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Application of behavioural theories, models, and frameworks in pharmacy practice research based on published evidence: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- A behaviour and disease transmission model: incorporating the Health Belief Model for human behaviour into a simple transmission model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Evaluation and associated factors of public health emergency management among medical college students in a city in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- [COVID-19 and the predominant groups of preventive behaviors and associated factors: semi-urban area].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBehavioural science can play a critical role in combatting the effects of an infectious disease outbreak or public health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The current paper presents a synthesis of review literature discussing the application of behaviour change theories within an infectious disease and emergency response context, with a view to informing infectious disease modelling, research and public health practice.
methodsA scoping review procedure was adopted for the searches. Searches were run on PubMed, PsychInfo and Medline with search terms covering four major categories: behaviour, emergency response (e.g., infectious disease, preparedness, mass emergency), theoretical models, and reviews. Three further top-up reviews was also conducted using Google Scholar. Papers were included if they presented a review of theoretical models as applied to understanding preventative health behaviours in the context of emergency preparedness and response, and/or infectious disease outbreaks.
resultsThirteen papers were included in the final synthesis. Across the reviews, several theories of behaviour change were identified as more commonly cited within this context, specifically, Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behaviour, and Protection Motivation Theory, with support (although not universal) for their effectiveness in this context. Furthermore, the application of these theories in previous primary research within this context was found to be patchy, and so further work is required to systematically incorporate and test behaviour change models within public health emergency research and interventions.
conclusionOverall, this review identifies a range of more commonly applied theories with broad support for their use within an infectious disease and emergency response context. The Discussion section details several key recommendations to help researchers, practitioners, and infectious disease modellers to incorporate these theories into their work. Specifically, researchers and practitioners should base future research and practice on a systematic application of theories, beginning with those reported herein. Furthermore, infectious disease modellers should consult the theories reported herein to ensure that the full range of relevant constructs (cognitive, emotional and social) are incorporated into their models. In all cases, consultation with behavioural scientists throughout these processes is strongly recommended to ensure the appropriate application of theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.