Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33004008›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

A stable DNA-free screening system for CRISPR/RNPs-mediated gene editing in hot and sweet cultivars of Capsicum annuum.

Hyeran Kim, Jisun Choi, Kang-Hee Won

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Tiny but powerful: protoplast isolation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic transformation and genome editing of flax (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-RNP mediatedPlant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyeran KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Kangwondaehak-gil 1, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea. ranny@kangwon.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-9510
Jisun ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Kangwondaehak-gil 1, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea.
Kang-Hee WonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kangwon National University, Kangwondaehak-gil 1, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea.
Kangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA-free, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein (Cas) ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-based genome editing is a simple, convincing, and promising tool for precision crop breeding. The efficacy of designed CRISPR-based genome editing tools is a critical prerequisite for successful precision gene editing in crops.

resultsThis study demonstrates that soil-grown leaf- or callus-derived pepper protoplasts are a useful system for screening of efficient guide RNAs for CRISPR/Cas9 or CRISPR/Cas12a (Cpf1). CRISPR/Cas9 or Cpf1 were delivered as CRISPR/RNP complexes of purified endonucleases mixed with the designed single guide RNA, which can edit the target gene, CaMLO2 in two pepper cultivars with whole genome sequenced, Capsicum annuum 'CM334' and C. annuum 'Dempsey'. The designed guide RNAs (sgRNAs for Cas9 or crRNAs for Cpf1) are conserved for CaMLO2 in both CM334 and Dempsey and cleave CaMLO2 in vitro. CRISPR/Cas9- or /Cpf1-RNP complexes were transfected into purely isolated protoplasts of the hot pepper CM334 and sweet pepper Dempsey by PEG-mediated delivery. Targeted deep sequencing analysis indicated that the targeted CaMLO2 gene was differentially edited in both cultivars, depending on the applied CRISPR/RNPs.

conclusionsPepper protoplast-based CRISPR guide-RNA selection is a robust method to check the efficacy of designed CRISPR tools and is a prerequisite for regenerating edited plants, which is a critical time-limiting procedure. The rapid and convincing selection of guide RNA against a target genome reduces the laborious efforts for tissue culture and facilitates effective gene editing for pepper improvement.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationCapsicumCRISPR-Cas SystemsCrops, AgriculturalGene EditingGenome, PlantGenotypeRepublic of KoreaRibonucleoproteinsRibonucleoproteinsC. annuum DempseyCapsicum annuum CM334CRISPR/Cas9CRISPR/LbCpf1Pepper callus protoplastsPepper genome editingPepper leaf protoplasts

Identifiers

PMID33004008
PMCPMC7528386
OpenAlexW3091236128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.