ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020
A cochlea with three parts? Evidence from otoacoustic emission phase in humans.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Latencies of Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Their Relation to Auditory Brainstem Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- The Effects of Broadband Elicitor Duration on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and a Psychoacoustic Measure of Gain Reduction.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- The cortilymph wave: Its relation to the traveling wave, auditory-nerve responses, and low-frequency downward glides.Hearing research · 2025Review
- The Origin Along the Cochlea of Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Mid-Frequency Tone Pips.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Swept Along: Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions Using Continuously Varying Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Extended low-frequency phase of the distortion-product otoacoustic emission in human newborns.JASA express letters · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The apical and basal regions of the cochlea appear functionally distinct. In humans, compelling evidence for an apical-basal transition derives from the phase of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), whose frequency dependence differs at low and high frequencies. Although OAEs arising from the two major source mechanisms (distortion and reflection) both support the existence of an apical-basal transition-as identified via a prominent bend (or "break") in OAE phase slope-the two OAE types disagree about its precise location along the cochlea. Whereas distortion OAEs at frequency 2f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.