Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33003567›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Consensual Sexting among College Students: The Interplay of Coercion and Intimate Partner Aggression in Perceived Consequences of Sexting.

Tara L Cornelius, Kathryn M Bell, Tylor Kistler, Michelle Drouin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tara L CorneliusDepartment of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI 49401, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8891-2228
Kathryn M BellDepartment of Psychology, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3321-6989
Tylor KistlerDepartment of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI 49401, USA.
Michelle DrouinDepartment of Psychology, Purdue University-Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent empirical data suggests that the majority of adolescents and emerging adults utilize digital technology to engage with texting and social media on a daily basis, with many using these mediums to engage in sexting (sending sexual texts, pictures, or videos via digital mediums). While research in the last decade has disproportionately focused on the potential risk factors and negative consequences associated with sexting, the data are limited by failing to differentiate consensual from non-consensual sexting and account for potential influences of intimate partner aggression (IPA) and sexting coercion in these contexts. In the current study, we assessed the positive and negative consequences associated with sexting, using behavioral theory as a framework, to determine the relationship between an individual's personal history of IPA victimization and the perceived consequences. Undergraduate students (

Indexed as

AggressionCoercionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersStudentsText MessagingYoung Adultcoerciondating violenceintimate partner aggressionsextingsexual assault

Identifiers

PMID33003567
PMCPMC7579237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.