ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
A Deep Brain Stimulation Trial Period for Treating Chronic Pain.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human intracranial signal stability tracks anatomical accuracy after electrode reimplantation.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Trial
- High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Modifies Tibial Nerve-Stimulation-Evoked Cortical Theta-Gamma Coupling in Sheep Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Review
- Toward Individualized Deep Brain Stimulation: A Stereoelectroencephalography-Based Workflow for Neurostimulation Target Identification.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2026Article
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Invasive brain mapping identifies personalized therapeutic neuromodulation targets that suppress OCD network activity.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Reporting guidelines for randomised controlled trial reports of implantable neurostimulation devices: the CONSORT-iNeurostim extension.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Reporting guidelines for protocols of randomised controlled trials of implantable neurostimulation devices: the SPIRIT-iNeurostim extension.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Deep Brain Stimulation, Stereotactic Radiosurgery and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Targeting the Limbic Pain Matrix: A Comprehensive Review.Pain and therapy · 2022Review
- The role of endogenous opioid neuropeptides in neurostimulation-driven analgesia.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Centromedian-Parafascicular and Somatosensory Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Contemporary Series of 40 Patients.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Special Issue: Trends in Clinical Deep Brain Stimulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Analysis-rcs-data: Open-Source Toolbox for the Ingestion, Time-Alignment, and Visualization of Sense and Stimulation Data From the Medtronic Summit RC+S System.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Brain Implants in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early studies of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for various neurological disorders involved a temporary trial period where implanted electrodes were externalized, in which the electrical contacts exiting the patient's brain are connected to external stimulation equipment, so that stimulation efficacy could be determined before permanent implant. As the optimal brain target sites for various diseases (i.e., Parkinson's disease, essential tremor) became better established, such trial periods have fallen out of favor. However, deep brain stimulation trial periods are experiencing a modern resurgence for at least two reasons: (1) studies of newer indications such as depression or chronic pain aim to identify new targets and (2) a growing interest in adaptive DBS tools necessitates neurophysiological recordings, which are often done in the peri-surgical period. In this review, we consider the possible approaches, benefits, and risks of such inpatient trial periods with a specific focus on developing new DBS therapies for chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.