ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2020
Modeling Desert Dust Exposures in Epidemiologic Short-term Health Effects Studies.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sand and dust storms: a growing global health threat calls for international health studies to support policy action.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2025Review
- Connections Between Air Pollution, Climate Change, and Cardiovascular Health.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2023Review
- Evaluating Data Product Exposure Metrics for Use in Epidemiologic Studies of Dust Storms.GeoHealth · 2023Article
- Exposure Assessment of Ambient PM2.5 Levels during a Sequence of Dust Episodes: A Case Study Coupling the WRF-Chem Model with GIS-Based Postprocessing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Climate change and cardiovascular disease: implications for global health.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Airborne Bacterial Community Composition According to Their Origin in Tenerife, Canary Islands.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDesert dust is assumed to have substantial adverse effects on human health. However, the epidemiologic evidence is still inconsistent, mainly because previous studies used different metrics for dust exposure and its corresponding epidemiologic analysis. We aim to provide a standardized approach to the methodology for evaluating the short-term health effects of desert dust.
methodsWe reviewed the methods commonly used for dust exposure assessment, from use of a binary metric for the occurrence of desert dust advections to a continuous one for quantifying particulate matter attributable to desert dust. We presented alternative time-series Poisson regression models to evaluate the dust exposure-mortality association, from the underlying epidemiological and policy-relevant questions. A set of practical examples, using a real dataset from Rome, Italy, illustrate the different modeling approaches.
resultsWe estimate substantial effects of desert dust episodes and particulate matter with diameter <10 μm (PM10) on daily mortality. The estimated effect of non-desert PM10 was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 3.2) for a 10 μg/m rise of PM10 at lag 0 for dust days, 0.4% (95% CI = -0.1, 0.8) for non-dust days, and 0.6% (95% CI = -0.5, 2.1) for desert PM10.
conclusionThe standardized modeling approach we propose could be applicable elsewhere, in and near hot spots, which could lead to more consistent evidence on the health effects of desert dust from future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.