Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33003037›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2021

Doctor, Will You Pray for Me? Responding to Patients' Religious and Spiritual Concerns.

Robert Klitzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert KlitzmanR. Klitzman is professor of psychiatry and director, Master of Bioethics Program, Columbia University, New York, New York; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-8063 .

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024156 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$53.0M
Views of Privacy of Genetic InformationR01HG002431 · NHGRI · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE · PI KLITZMAN, ROBERT L · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
SELF-DISCLOSURE AMONG HIV+ HEALTH CARE WORKERS &OTHERSK08MH001420 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KLITZMAN, ROBERT L · 1996 to 1998
–
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024156NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002431NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religion and spirituality in the United States have been shifting, and physicians are treating patients with increasingly diverse beliefs. Physicians' unfamiliarity with these beliefs poses critical challenges for medical education and practice. Despite efforts to improve medical education in religion/spirituality, most doctors feel their training in these areas is inadequate. This article draws on the author's conversations with providers and patients over several years in various clinical and research contexts in which religious/spiritual issues have arisen. These conversations provided insights into how patients and their families commonly, and often unexpectedly, make religious/spiritual comments to their providers or question their providers about these topics, directly or indirectly. Comments are of at least 9 types that fall within 4 broad domains: (1) perceiving God's role in disease and treatment (in causing disease, affecting treatment outcomes, and knowing disease outcomes), (2) making medical decisions (seeking God's help in making these decisions and determining types/extents of treatment), (3) interacting with providers (ascertaining providers' beliefs, having preferences regarding providers, and requesting prayer with or by providers), and (4) pondering an afterlife. Because of their beliefs or lack of knowledge, doctors face challenges in responding and often do so in 1 of 4 broad ways: (1) not commenting, (2) asking strictly medical questions, (3) referring the patient to a chaplain, or (4) commenting on the patient's remark. Medical education should thus encourage providers to recognize the potential significance of patients' remarks regarding these topics and to be prepared to respond, even if briefly, by developing appropriate responses to each statement type. Becoming aware of potential differences between key aspects of non-Western faiths (e.g., through case vignettes) could be helpful. Further research should examine in greater depth how patients broach these realms, how physicians respond, and how often medical school curricula mention non-Western traditions.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCurriculumEducation, MedicalHumansPatientsPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansReligionSpiritualityTerminal CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33003037
PMCPMC7933033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.