Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33002259›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2021

Comparison of Patient and Expert Perceptions of the Attainment of Research Milestones in Parkinson's Disease.

Patrick Bodilly Kane, Daniel M Benjamin, Roger A Barker, Anthony E Lang, Todd Sherer, Jonathan Kimmelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick Bodilly KaneBiomedical Ethics Unit, Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM) Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-570X
Daniel M BenjaminInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, California, USA.
Roger A BarkerJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council (WT/MRC) Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Anthony E LangEdmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and the Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Todd ShererThe Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, New York, USA.
Jonathan KimmelmanBiomedical Ethics Unit, Studies of Translation, Ethics and Medicine (STREAM) Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR EOG-131588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommentators suggest that patients have unrealistic expectations about the pace of research advances and that such expectations interfere with patient decision-making.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare expert expectations about the timing of research milestone attainment with those of patients who follow Parkinson's disease (PD) research.

methodsPatients with PD and experts were asked to provide forecasts about 11 milestones in PD research in an online survey. PD experts were identified from a Michael J. Fox Foundation database, highly ranked neurology centers in the United States and Canada, and corresponding authors of articles on PD in top medical journals. Patients with PD were recruited through the Michael J. Fox Foundation. We tested whether patient forecasts differed on average from expert forecasts. We also tested whether differences between patient forecasts and the average expert forecasts were associated with any demographic factors.

resultsA total of 256 patients and 249 PD experts completed the survey. For 9 of the 11 milestones, patients' forecasts were on average higher than those of experts. Only exercise therapy met our 10% difference threshold for practical significance. Education was the only demographic that predicted patient deviations from expert forecasts on milestone forecasts. Patients offered significantly higher forecasts than experts that the clinical trials used in milestone queries would report positive primary outcomes.

conclusionsDifferences between patient and expert expectations about research milestones were generally minor, suggesting that there is little cause for concern that patients who follow PD research are unduly swayed by inaccurate representations of research advancement in the media or elsewhere. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

NeurologyParkinson DiseaseCanadaHumansPerceptionUnited StatesParkinson's disease; prediction; forecasting

Identifiers

PMID33002259
PMCPMC7891331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.