Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33002206›Full record

SynthesisCA: a cancer journal for clinicians2021

Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions.

Mina S Sedrak, Rachel A Freedman, Harvey J Cohen, Hyman B Muss, Aminah Jatoi, Heidi D Klepin, Tanya M Wildes, Jennifer G Le-Rademacher, Gretchen G Kimmick, William P Tew and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 298 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
298citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

298 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review

238 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Mina S SedrakCenter for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-391X
Rachel A FreedmanDepartment of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvey J CohenDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Hyman B MussDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Aminah JatoiDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Heidi D KlepinDepartment of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Tanya M WildesDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Jennifer G Le-RademacherDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Gretchen G KimmickDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
William P TewDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kevin GeorgeDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Simran PadamDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Jennifer LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Andrew R WongDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Andrea LynchGraff Library, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Benjamin DjulbegovicDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Supriya G MohileDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
William DaleDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG)

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
Improving Clinical Trial Participation of Older Adults with CancerR03AG064377 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI SEDRAK, MINA S · 2019 to 2020
$260k
Circle 1500NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064377Waisman Innovation Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a disease of aging and, as the world's population ages, the number of older persons with cancer is increasing and will make up a growing share of the oncology population in virtually every country. Despite this, older patients remain vastly underrepresented in research that sets the standards for cancer treatments. Consequently, most of what we know about cancer therapeutics is based on clinical trials conducted in younger, healthier patients, and effective strategies to improve clinical trial participation of older adults with cancer remain sparse. For this systematic review, the authors evaluated published studies regarding barriers to participation and interventions to improve participation of older adults in cancer trials. The quality of the available evidence was low and, despite a literature describing multifaceted barriers, only one intervention study aimed to increase enrollment of older adults in trials. The findings starkly amplify the paucity of evidence-based, effective strategies to improve participation of this underrepresented population in cancer trials. Within these limitations, the authors provide their opinion on how the current cancer research infrastructure must be modified to accommodate the needs of older patients. Several underused solutions are offered to expand clinical trials to include older adults with cancer. However, as currently constructed, these recommendations alone will not solve the evidence gap in geriatric oncology, and efforts are needed to meet older and frail adults where they are by expanding clinical trials designed specifically for this population and leveraging real-world data.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials as TopicGeriatricsHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationUnited Statesclinical trialsolder adultsoncologypatient participationpatient selectionpractice patterns

Identifiers

PMID33002206
PMCPMC7854940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.