Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33002132›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2020

T follicular helper phenotype predicts response to histone deacetylase inhibitors in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Paola Ghione, Promie Faruque, Neha Mehta-Shah, Venkatraman Seshan, Neval Ozkaya, Shakthi Bhaskar, James Yeung, Michael A Spinner, Matthew Lunning, Giorgio Inghirami and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel agents and therapeutic advances in T cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Paola GhioneLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Promie FaruqueLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Neha Mehta-ShahLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Venkatraman SeshanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and.
Neval OzkayaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Shakthi BhaskarDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
James YeungHematology Department, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Michael A SpinnerDepartment of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford CA.
Matthew LunningLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Giorgio InghiramiDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Alison MoskowitzLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Natasha GalassoLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Nivetha GanesanLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Carrie van der WeydenDivision of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Parkville, Australia; and.
Jia RuanDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
H Miles PrinceDivision of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Parkville, Australia; and.
Judith TrotmanHematology Department, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ranjana AdvaniDepartment of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford CA.
Ahmet DoganDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Steven HorwitzLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USStanford University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AURoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translating Stress Response Targeted Therapy for B-Cell LymphomasP50CA192937 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DALLA-FAVERA, RICCARDO, ZELENETZ, ANDREW D. · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
Preclinical Models and Therapeutics CoreP01CA229100 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI SCOTT, DAVID WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$10.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA229100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA192937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are active agents for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Anecdotally angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) appears to respond better than PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) to HDACi. The new World Health Organization classification shows that a subgroup of PTCL carries similarities in phenotype and gene expression profiling to AITL, comparable to T follicular helper (TFH) cells. The disease might behave similarly to AITL when treated with HDACi. We analyzed 127 patients with AITL or PTCL-NOS treated with HDACi at relapse as a single agent or in combination. We re-reviewed the pathology of all PTCL-NOS to identify the TFH phenotype. Patients received HDACi at relapse as a single agent in 97 cases (76%, 59 TFH, 38 non-TFH) or in combination in 30 cases (24%, 18 TFH, 12 non-TFH) including duvelisib, lenalidomide, lenalidomide plus carfilzomib, and pralatrexate. Seven PTCL-NOS had TFH phenotype; 2 PTCL-NOS were reclassified as AITL. Overall response rate (ORR) was 56.5% (28.9% complete response [CR]) in TFH and 29.4% (19.6% CR) in non-TFH phenotype patients (P = .0035), with TFH phenotype being an independent predictor of ORR (P = .009). Sixteen patients sufficiently responded to HDACi or HDACi in combination with another agent to proceed directly to allogeneic transplantation; 1 of 16 responded to donor lymphocyte infusion (12 TFH, 4 non-TFH). Our results, although retrospective, support that HDACi, as a single agent or in combination, may have superior activity in TFH-PTCL compared with non-TFH PTCL. This differential efficacy could help inform subtype-specific therapy and guide interpretation of HDACi trials.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33002132
PMCPMC7556143
OpenAlexW3091245075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.