ArticlePloS one2020
Implementation of global health competencies: A scoping review on target audiences, levels, and pedagogy and assessment strategies.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Global Health Assessment for Education in Healthcare Professions.Annals of global health · 2022Pooled it
- A collaborative multi-university virtual model for global health leadership education integrating educational technology: a mixed methods evaluation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global health in Canadian anesthesiology residency programs: an online survey of opportunities and barriers.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Dutch post-graduate training in Global Health and Tropical Medicine: a qualitative study on graduates' perspectives.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Global health education programs: Are we embedding contemporary global health needs into the curriculum of master's programs?Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Challenges and enablers for scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases: a qualitative study applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to 19 research projects worldwide.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Identifying core global mental health professional competencies: A multi-sectoral perspective.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Developing global health education in Chinese universities: challenges and opportunities.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2023Article
- Global health competencies in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review and mapping to the CanMEDS physician competency framework.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Key factors influencing public health students and curricula in India: Recommendations from a mixed methods analysis.PloS one · 2023Review
- Defining and utilizing individualized learning objectives to achieve learning priorities for global health leaders.PloS one · 2022Article
- Learner Milestones to Guide Decolonial Global Health Education.Annals of global health · 2022Article
- Four Learner Categories in Global Health Experiences: A Framework for Successful Resident Engagement.Annals of global health · 2022Article
- Training Global Health Leaders: A Critical Review of Competency Gaps.Annals of global health · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the field of global health expands, the recognition of structured training for field-based public health professionals has grown. Substantial effort has gone towards defining competency domains for public health professionals working globally. However, there is limited literature on how to implement competency-based training into learning curricula and evaluation strategies.
objectivesThis scoping review seeks to collate the current status, degree of consensus, and best practices, as well as gaps and areas of divergence, related to the implementation of competencies in global health curricula. Specifically, we sought to examine (i) the target audience, (ii) the levels or milestones, and (iii) the pedagogy and assessment approaches. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: A review of the published and grey literature was completed to identify published and grey literature sources that presented information on how to implement or support global health and public health competency-based education programs. In particular, we sought to capture any attempts to assign levels or milestones, any evaluation strategies, and the different pedagogical approaches.
resultsOut of 68 documents reviewed, 21 documents were included which contained data related to the implementation of competency-based training programs; of these, 18 were peer-reviewed and three were from the grey literature. Most of the sources focused on post-graduate public health students, professional trainees pursuing continuing education training, and clinical and allied health professionals working in global health. Two approaches were identified to defining skill level or milestones, namely: (i) defining levels of increasing ability or (ii) changing roles across career stages. Pedagogical approaches featured field experience, direct engagement, group work, and self-reflection. Assessment approaches included self-assessment surveys, evaluations by peers and supervisors, and mixed methods assessments.
conclusionsThe implementation of global health competencies needs to respond to the needs of specific agencies or particular groups of learners. A milestones approach may aide these efforts while also support monitoring and evaluation. Further development is needed to understand how to assess competencies in a consistent and relevant manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.