Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33002028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

On the dependence of the cardiac motion artifact on the breathing cycle in liver diffusion-weighted imaging.

Andreas Riexinger, Frederik Bernd Laun, Sebastian Bickelhaupt, Hannes Seuß, Michael Uder, Bernhard Hensel, Marc Saake

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous liver TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas RiexingerInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-3526
Frederik Bernd LaunInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian BickelhauptInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Hannes SeußInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael UderInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Bernhard HenselCenter for Medical Physics and Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Marc SaakeInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether the cardiac motion artifact that regularly appears in diffusion-weighted imaging of the left liver lobe might be reduced by acquiring images in inspiration, when the coupling between heart and liver might be minimal. MATERIALS AND

methods43 patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions were examined at 1.5 T with breath hold acquisition, once in inspiration and once in expiration. Data were acquired with a diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging sequence and two b-values (b50 = 50 s/mm² and b800 = 800 s/mm²). The severity of the cardiac motion artifact in the left liver lobe was rated by two experienced radiologists for both b-values with a 5 point Likert scale. Additionally, the normalized signal S(b800)/S(b50) in the left liver lobe was computed. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used comparing the scores of the two readers obtained in inspiration and expiration, and to compare the normalized signal in inspiration and expiration.

resultsThe normalized signal in inspiration was slightly higher than in expiration (0.349±0.077 vs 0.336±0.058), which would indicate a slight reduction of the cardiac motion artifact, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.24). In the qualitative evaluation, the readers did not observe a significant difference for b50 (reader 1: p = 0.61; reader 2: p = 0.18). For b800, reader 1 observed a significant difference of small effect size favouring expiration (p = 0.03 with a difference of mean Likert scores of 0.27), while reader 2 observed no significant difference (p = 0.62).

conclusionAcquiring the data in inspiration does not lead to a markedly reduced cardiac motion artifact in diffusion-weighted imaging of the left liver lobe and is in this regard not to be preferred over acquiring the data in expiration.

Indexed as

RespirationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArtifactsBreath HoldingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingExhalationFemaleHeartHumansLiverLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33002028
PMCPMC7529231
OpenAlexW3090087660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.