Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33002006›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Evaluation of a large-scale flow manipulation to the upper San Francisco Estuary: Response of habitat conditions for an endangered native fish.

Ted Sommer, Rosemary Hartman, Michal Koller, Michael Koohafkan, J Louise Conrad, Michael MacWilliams, Aaron Bever, Christina Burdi, April Hennessy, Michael Beakes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Time-varying flow-ecology relationships for an endangered fish population: Longfin Smelt in the San Francisco Estuary.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Floodplain inundation and lateral connectivity promote productivity in a managed river ecosystem.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ted SommerCalifornia Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-9831
Rosemary HartmanCalifornia Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Michal KollerCalifornia Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Michael KoohafkanCalifornia Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
J Louise ConradDelta Science Program, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Michael MacWilliamsAnchor QEA, LLC, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Aaron BeverAnchor QEA, LLC, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Christina BurdiCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Stockton, California, United States of America.
April HennessyCalifornia Department of Fish and Wildlife, Stockton, California, United States of America.
Michael BeakesU.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife · USSan Joaquin Delta College · USUnited States Bureau of Reclamation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While flow is known to be a major driver of estuarine ecosystems, targeted flow manipulations are rare because tidal systems are extremely variable in space and time, and because the necessary infrastructure is rarely available. In summer 2018 we used a unique water control structure in the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) to direct a managed flow pulse into Suisun Marsh, one of the largest contiguous tidal marshes on the west coast of the United States. The action was designed to increase habitat suitability for the endangered Delta Smelt Hypomesus transpacificus, a small osmerid fish endemic to the upper SFE. The approach was to operate the Suisun Marsh Salinity Control Gates (SMSCG) in conjunction with increased Sacramento River tributary inflow to direct an estimated 160 x 106 m3 pulse of low salinity water into Suisun Marsh during August, a critical time period for juvenile Delta Smelt rearing. Three-dimensional modeling showed that directing additional low salinity water into Suisun Marsh ("Flow Action") substantially increased the area of low salinity habitat for Delta Smelt that persisted beyond the period of SMSCG operations. Field monitoring showed that turbidity and chlorophyll were at higher levels in Suisun Marsh, representing better habitat conditions, than the upstream Sacramento River region throughout the study period. The Flow Action had no substantial effects on zooplankton abundance, nor did Suisun Marsh show enhanced levels of these prey species in comparison to the Sacramento River. Fish monitoring data suggested that small numbers of Delta Smelt colonized Suisun Marsh from the Sacramento River during the 2018 Flow Action. Comparison of the salinity effects of the Flow Action to historical catch data for Suisun Marsh further supported our hypothesis that the Flow Action would have some benefit for this rare species. Our study provides insight into both the potential use of targeted flow manipulations to support endangered fishes such as Delta Smelt, and into the general response of estuarine habitat to flow management.

Indexed as

Ecological Parameter MonitoringEstuariesOsmeriformesAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesMicrocystisRiversSalinitySan FranciscoWetlandsZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID33002006
PMCPMC7529229
OpenAlexW3091170130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.