ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
A genotype imputation method for de-identified haplotype reference information by using recurrent neural network.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- ALGI: Sparse Convolutional Denoising Autoencoder Utilizing Local Genomic Information for Genotype Imputation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
- Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- STICI: Split-Transformer with integrated convolutions for genotype imputation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Genotype imputation methods for whole and complex genomic regions utilizing deep learning technology.Journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Two-stage strategy using denoising autoencoders for robust reference-free genotype imputation with missing input genotypes.Journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Efficient HLA imputation from sequential SNPs data by transformer.Journal of human genetics · 2024Review
- Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Article
- Construction of a trio-based structural variation panel utilizing activated T lymphocytes and long-read sequencing technology.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of vicinity-based hidden Markov models for genotype imputation.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Using machine learning to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of reproduction traits in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence powered statistical genetics in biobanks.Journal of human genetics · 2021Review
- Application of Genomic Big Data in Plant Breeding:Past, Present, and Future.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genotype imputation estimates the genotypes of unobserved variants using the genotype data of other observed variants based on a collection of haplotypes for thousands of individuals, which is known as a haplotype reference panel. In general, more accurate imputation results were obtained using a larger size of haplotype reference panel. Most of the existing genotype imputation methods explicitly require the haplotype reference panel in precise form, but the accessibility of haplotype data is often limited, due to the requirement of agreements from the donors. Since de-identified information such as summary statistics or model parameters can be used publicly, imputation methods using de-identified haplotype reference information might be useful to enhance the quality of imputation results under the condition where the access of the haplotype data is limited. In this study, we proposed a novel imputation method that handles the reference panel as its model parameters by using bidirectional recurrent neural network (RNN). The model parameters are presented in the form of de-identified information from which the restoration of the genotype data at the individual-level is almost impossible. We demonstrated that the proposed method provides comparable imputation accuracy when compared with the existing imputation methods using haplotype datasets from the 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) and the Haplotype Reference Consortium. We also considered a scenario where a subset of haplotypes is made available only in de-identified form for the haplotype reference panel. In the evaluation using the 1KGP dataset under the scenario, the imputation accuracy of the proposed method is much higher than that of the existing imputation methods. We therefore conclude that our RNN-based method is quite promising to further promote the data-sharing of sensitive genome data under the recent movement for the protection of individuals' privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.