ArticleNMR in biomedicine2021
Supervised segmentation framework for evaluation of diffusion tensor imaging indices in skeletal muscle.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D Automated Segmentation of Lower Leg Muscles Using Machine Learning on a Heterogeneous Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- High Inter-Rater Reliability of Manual Segmentation and Volume-Based Tractography in Healthy and Dystrophic Human Calf Muscle.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Supervised segmentation framework for evaluation of diffusion tensor imaging indices in skeletal muscle.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Overview of MR Image Segmentation Strategies in Neuromuscular Disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is becoming a relevant diagnostic tool to understand muscle disease and map muscle recovery processes following physical activity or after injury. Segmenting all the individual leg muscles, necessary for quantification, is still a time-consuming manual process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a supervised semi-automatic segmentation pipeline on the quantification of DTI indices in individual upper leg muscles. Longitudinally acquired MRI datasets (baseline, post-marathon and follow-up) of the upper legs of 11 subjects were used in this study. MR datasets consisted of a DTI and Dixon acquisition. Semi-automatic segmentations for the upper leg muscles were performed using a transversal propagation approach developed by Ogier et al on the out-of-phase Dixon images at baseline. These segmentations were longitudinally propagated for the post-marathon and follow-up time points. Manual segmentations were performed on the water image of the Dixon for each of the time points. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to compare the manual and semi-automatic segmentations. Bland-Altman and regression analyses were performed, to evaluate the impact of the two segmentation methods on mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) and the third eigenvalue (λ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.