ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021
Experienced bedside-assistants improve operative outcomes for surgeons early in their learning curve for robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.World journal of urology · 2022Pooled it
- Assist team self-efficacy, training needs, and operative outcomes in single-port robotic hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a mixed-methods study to inform protocol development.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The robotic PIANO: a critical narrative review of surgeon-controlled operative polyphony, human factors, and robotic training.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Patient-side performance metrics and errors in robotic surgery: Junior- European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section/Young Academic Urologists (J-ERUS/YAU) construct validation.BJU international · 2026Article
- Standardising robotic system setup: an international expert consensus.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Complete transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery achieves superior outcomes in difficult hepatectomies: a seven-year retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Consensus guidelines on the bedside assistant skills required in robotic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Article
- Experience matters for robotic assistance: an analysis of case data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery: clinical outcomes, learning curve effect, and cost-effectiveness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) relies heavily on the bedside assistant (BA). Currently, the relationship between BA experience and surgical outcomes in robotic surgery is not clear. We examined whether bedside assistant experience can significantly affect positive margin rate and peri-operative outcomes for RALP for surgeons within their learning curve. A retrospective cohort study of a single surgeon's peri-operative outcomes during RALP was examined and compared with and without an experienced bedside assistant. Patient demographic data and peri-operative data, margin rate, and length of stay (LOS), were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine if expert BA was a predictor of post-operative outcomes. In total, 170 consecutive cases over three years were analyzed. 111 (65%) were performed without an expert BA. The two groups were not significantly different with regards patient demographics (p > 0.05). On univariate analysis, having an expert BA was associated with a significantly lower LOS (31 h ± 21 vs. 42 h ± 26, p = 0.004), EBL (296 ml ± 180 vs. 441 ml ± 305, p < 0.0001) and positive margin rate (20% vs. 37%, p = 0.03). Other surgical outcomes were comparable between groups. On multivariable analysis, expert BA remained a predictor of, EBL (B stat = - 146, 95% CI - 240 to - 52, p = 0.003) and positive margin rate (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.96, p = 0.04). Our results demonstrate that the use of an expert BA may result in improved patient outcomes early in the learning curve of RALP, most notably, positive margin rate and estimated blood loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.