Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33001365›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

Effects of cage type on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle.

E E Onbaşılar, M Kahraman, Ö F Güngör, A Kocakaya, T Karakan, M Pirpanahi, B Doğan, D Metin, M Akan, A Şehu and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E E OnbaşılarDepartment of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. onbasilar@ankara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-0280
M KahramanDepartment of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Harran University, Urfa, Turkey.
Ö F GüngörDepartment of Veterinary, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Vocational School of Mudurnu Süreyya Astarcı, Bolu, Turkey.
A KocakayaDepartment of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
T KarakanDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
M PirpanahiDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
B DoğanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
D MetinDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
M AkanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
A ŞehuDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
F K Erbay ElibolDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Turkey.
S YalçınDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Ankara University · TRBolu Abant İzzet Baysal University · TRHarran University · TRSelçuk University · TRTOBB University of Economics and Technology · TR

Funding

TUBİTAK (2170349)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As most of the unenriched cages will soon switch to enriched cages, it is important to characterize all the effects in the laying hens for sustainable production. Laying hens can be used in several production periods by applying molting. The aim of this study was to determine the cage type (unenriched and enriched) on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle. Overall, 840 brown laying hybrids were used in the experiment. Laying hens were reared on two different cage types (unenriched cage (UEC) and enriched cage (EC)) in the same poultry house. When the hybrids were 75 weeks old, they were subjected to force molting with whole grain barley. Performance, welfare, microbiological, and serological data of laying hens were obtained from 73 to 107 weeks of age. Egg production, egg weight, feed conversion ratio, breaking strength, albumen and yolk index, Haugh unit, feather condition, and breaking force of femur and metatarsus were better in the post-molting period. However, keel bone deformities and Newcastle disease virus antibody titers are the worst in the post-molting period. Stiffness of femur and metatarsus was increased with period. These results indicate that necessary precautions should be taken against the problems that may occur in the direction of bone and health. During the molting period, hens kept in EC had lower egg production but they returned to egg production at a high rate. EC type had a positive effect on egg production, feed conversion ratio, feather and foot condition, and breaking force of metatarsus.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensFemaleHousing, AnimalMoltingCage typeHealthLaying henMoltingPerformanceWelfare

Identifiers

PMID33001365
OpenAlexW3090985081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.